2013
DOI: 10.1080/1350293x.2013.789197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an inversion of the deficit model of intervention in children's play

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They demonstrated disinterest in environmental exploration and limited interaction with resources. Contrary to observations by Wragg (2013), children with NDD needed and sought additional reassurance through staff guidance and direction. The lack of structure for play sessions also impacted upon staff confidence and required the staff to adopt different communication partner skills to develop and support a child-led learning approach.…”
Section: Planned Interventions: Cyclementioning
confidence: 95%
“…They demonstrated disinterest in environmental exploration and limited interaction with resources. Contrary to observations by Wragg (2013), children with NDD needed and sought additional reassurance through staff guidance and direction. The lack of structure for play sessions also impacted upon staff confidence and required the staff to adopt different communication partner skills to develop and support a child-led learning approach.…”
Section: Planned Interventions: Cyclementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rethinking assessment so that it is based on what the child is rather than what he or she is not would be an innovative way of approaching assessment that moves away from deficit models. This links to the wider debate in the field of early education and care about the deficit versus the capable and competent view of the child and the extent to which the pedagogies and associated assessments used in settings value the child's contribution in the present or focus on what needs to be added or developed to fulfil their future potential (Wragg, 2013). Children who receive low scores in their school readiness assessments could be seen as needing to "catch up," because the score suggests that they are starting from further back on their assessment profile, and this has implications for the subsequent pedagogy and practice used in early years settings.…”
Section: School Readiness and Child Development Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Children with lower baseline scores could be seen as needing to 'catch up' as they are starting from further back on the assessment profile and this could have implications for pedagogy and practice in early years settings with pressure on practitioners to focus on skill-specific activities that will improve assessment scores for children with lower baselines rather than promoting more child-led experiential learning approaches. This links to the wider debate in the field of early education and care about the deficit versus the capable and competent view of the child and the extent to which the pedagogies used in settings value the child's contribution in the present or focus on what needs to be added or developed to fulfil their future potential (Wragg 2013). The allocation of a 'starting point' score to a child which allows them to be ranked on a scale leans towards the deficit model, suggesting that those with lower scores need additional and specific learning experiences to get them to the 'norm'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%