2017
DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2017/a0228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an integrated ecological restoration approach for abandoned agricultural fields in renosterveld, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low success rate of the Remove‐grass‐sow‐plant treatment could possibly be due to the high remaining grass component within the surrounding habitat of treatment plots, that were still distributing seed into the plot area. Alien grass species grow faster than native plants (Acosta et al 2006; Ruwanza 2017) and can produce high quantities of seed. There is a possibility that some of the existing native seeds could have been removed with the invasive grass layers or that the results here are linked to the features of the tested site itself, which had a very distinct history of alien grass species being present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low success rate of the Remove‐grass‐sow‐plant treatment could possibly be due to the high remaining grass component within the surrounding habitat of treatment plots, that were still distributing seed into the plot area. Alien grass species grow faster than native plants (Acosta et al 2006; Ruwanza 2017) and can produce high quantities of seed. There is a possibility that some of the existing native seeds could have been removed with the invasive grass layers or that the results here are linked to the features of the tested site itself, which had a very distinct history of alien grass species being present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gentili et al (2015) made a similar recommendation for degraded grasslands in Italy. In a review of South African renosterveld old-field restoration studies, Ruwanza (2017) found that factors inhibiting ecological restoration interact to lock the system in a degraded state; they recommend an integrated approach using multiple methods to improve restoration outcomes.…”
Section: Box 2 Passive Versus Active Restoration Approachessummary Of Global Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some renosterveld remnants, namely the shrubs D. rhinocerotis and Helichrysum spp. and the geophyte Oxalis purpurea are recruiting [37,42], most of these are scattered along old field furrows as compared to ridges [31]. The above-mentioned open grassy old fields (>75% grass cover) differ from the adjacent natural vegetation not only in the degree of woody cover (>75% woody cover) but also in the abundance of the herbaceous and geophyte species [37].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%