Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework

Abstract

An effective approach to research on farmers' behaviour is based on: i) an explicit and well motivated behavioural theory; ii) an integrative approach; iii) understanding feedback processes and dynamics. While current approaches may effectively tackle some of them, they often fail to combine them together. The paper presents the integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework, which aims at filling this gap. It functions in accordance with these three pillars and provides a conceptual structure to understand farmers' behaviour in agricultural systems. The IAC framework is agent-centred and supports the understanding of farmers' behavior consistently with the perspective of agricultural systems as complex Social-Ecological Systems. It combines different behavioural drivers, bridges between micro and macro levels, and depicts a potentially varied model of human agency. The use of the framework in practice is illustrated through two studies on pesticide use among smallholders in Colombia. The examples show how the framework can be implemented to derive policy implications to foster a transition towards more sustainable agricultural practices. The paper finally suggests that the framework can support different research designs for the study of agents' behaviour in agricultural and social-ecological systems Feola, G., Binder, C.R., 2010. Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework, Ecol. Econ. 69, 2323Econ. 69, -2333

Perceptions of the beneficial and harmful effects of pesticides among Iranian rice farmers influence the adoption of biological control

“…This demonstrates the importance of reducing pesticide overuse to meet the increasing demands of consumers for healthy products. Concerning the relationship between the amount of pesticides applied and farmers' perceptions of pesticide effects, a possible explanation could lie in the significant capability of pesticides to increase crop productivity and farm income (Feola and Binder, 2010). As farmers become increasingly dependent on pesticide use for pest control, it is likely that they will also become increasingly aware of common pros of pesticides (i.e., less labor, efficient pest control, high yields, high income) and these positive perceptions will certainly overshadow, at least in the short term, any cons of pesticide use in their farms.…”

Evaluating the Impacts of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones on the Environment and Farmers’ Practices: A Scottish Case Study

“…Agricultural systems are now recognised as being intricate socialecological systems, and so the effectiveness of policies depends on a thorough understanding of the attitudes and behaviour of farmers who are the key actors (Feola & Binder 2010;Sattler & Nagel 2010). Because environmental outcomes in agricultural regions are largely determined by farmers' decisions, policy targets will only be achieved when farmers choose to adopt new practices.…”

Application of the SES Framework for Model-based Analysis of the Dynamics of Social-Ecological Systems

“…Based on the respective disciplinary frameworks and theories such approaches tend to oversimplify either the ecological or the social domain, and often fall short in exploring and explaining the social-ecological feedbacks that drive the development of the coupled SES (Schlüter et al 2012). More recently, emerging interdisciplinary approaches such as resilience theory, ecological economics, and complex adaptive system theory have contributed to an integrative study of SES, but these have often been criticized for their "ad hoc" approach to representing relevant variables and processes, particularly with respect to modeling changes in human behavior (Feola and Binder 2010).…”