2011
DOI: 10.7763/ijeeee.2011.v1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Identification and Classification of Service Quality Attributes in Higher Education

Abstract: Abstract-In what has become a highly competitive environment, students have become more discriminating in their selection and more demanding of the universities they choose. It is important then for institutions to understand service quality attributes what incoming students desire (and increasingly expect) from the institution of their choice. Higher education (HE) institutions should ensure that all services encounters are managed to enhance students' perceived quality. While there is a consensus on the impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voss, Gruber, and Reppel (2010) have specifically called for more research on classroom-based service encounters. While there has been some controversy as to whether education should be treated as a service with students viewed as customers (see, e.g., Bowden, 2011;Clayson & Haley, 2005;Obermiller, Fleenor, & Raven, 2005;Smith, 2013;Svensson & Wood, 2007), student satisfaction, or even delight, can create competitive advantage for the educational institution (Sukwadi, Yang, & Liu, 2011) and positively impact both student motivation (Elliott & Shin, 2002) and learning (Guolla, 1999). To our knowledge, no studies to date have recognized that when classroom encounters go well or poorly, students may not be simply satisfied or dissatisfied, but may feel the stronger emotions of delight or outrage.…”
Section: A View From the Aisle Revisited: Delight And Outrage In The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voss, Gruber, and Reppel (2010) have specifically called for more research on classroom-based service encounters. While there has been some controversy as to whether education should be treated as a service with students viewed as customers (see, e.g., Bowden, 2011;Clayson & Haley, 2005;Obermiller, Fleenor, & Raven, 2005;Smith, 2013;Svensson & Wood, 2007), student satisfaction, or even delight, can create competitive advantage for the educational institution (Sukwadi, Yang, & Liu, 2011) and positively impact both student motivation (Elliott & Shin, 2002) and learning (Guolla, 1999). To our knowledge, no studies to date have recognized that when classroom encounters go well or poorly, students may not be simply satisfied or dissatisfied, but may feel the stronger emotions of delight or outrage.…”
Section: A View From the Aisle Revisited: Delight And Outrage In The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By including ESD as an indicator of quality measurement, universities will be more aware of implementing it. Measurement instruments for sustainable universities are also available in several papers; for example, SusServQual [25].…”
Section: New Proposed Framework: 3 D Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%