Towards an Asian Model of Clusters and Cluster Policy: The Super Cluster Strategy

Abstract

Clusters are recognized as important drivers of competitiveness and economic development. There are various models of clusters development all over the world, some of which may be initiated bottom-up by private firms, as in most European countries, or top-down by public administrations. In the case of Asian clusters, many are driven by foreign direct investments (FDI), with the most notable example being China. The objective of this study is to examine the Super Cluster strategy introduced in Thailand in 2015, especially in terms of the rationale and mechanism for selecting assisted clusters as well as the instruments used to support them. The goal is to contribute to a more in-depth formulation of the Asian model of clusters and cluster policy. The conducted analysis shows that Thai strategy deviates from traditional bottom-up approaches to cluster policy, veering towards the top-down approach in which government designates targeted regions and industries for the development of clusters. Another finding is that the Super Cluster strategy shares more common characteristics with Special Economic Zones (SEZ) than it does with the traditional approach to cluster policy in terms of its main objective of attracting foreign direct investments (FDI), securing support mechanisms as well as in the selection of target areas and the type of instruments to be implemented. The experience of Thailand is discussed along with that of other Asian countries, most notably China, in order to identify and verify the characteristics of the Asian model of clusters and cluster policy.

Agrocluster as an instrument of socio-economic policy for the development of the region (based on the Rostov Region data)

“…World experience and domestic practice show that agricultural clusters are an effective tool for the socio-economic development of agricultural regions. The main advantages of the agrocluster making it an instrument of regional policy encompass [13][14]:…”

Application of Social Network Analysis to Visualization and Description of Industrial Clusters: A Case of the Textile Industry

“…Most authors consider the organic ("grass root") model of cluster creation by private companies a more effective one, leading to stronger results (Razminien ė et al 2021). They underline that the model of cluster initiation led by public administration usually provokes a sudden reaction with a less probable long-term existence of the newly established cluster (Kowalski 2020).…”

Behavioral additionality: the role of cooperation with research institutions in fostering technological maturity of enterprises

“…The general feature of different studies on innovation system is that they emphasize a set of interacting actors working together toward a shared goal of innovation [Lee et al, 2020]. A special form of cooperation are clusters which bring together academic institutions, research organizations or centers of excellence in specific regions, what can be observed mostly in the European Union [Kowalski, 2020]. This approach goes in line with open innovation paradigm, which states that one of the key factors of successful innovation activity is cooperation as the sources of innovation may be found not only inside, but also outside the company [Chesbrough, 2003].…”