2018
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an along‐track validation of HOAPS precipitation using OceanRAIN optical disdrometer data over the Atlantic Ocean

Abstract: The Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and fluxes from Satellite data (HOAPS) passive‐microwave precipitation scan product is compared with the Ocean Rainfall And Ice‐phase precipitation measurement Network (OceanRAIN) surface‐based precipitation reference dataset over the global ocean. For the first time, we apply statistical point‐to‐area adjustments and along‐track averaging to ship‐based OceanRAIN precipitation data over the Atlantic Ocean to represent collocated precipitation rates better within a HOAPS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For OceanRAIN, the 99th percentile of 1 min precipitation rates shows a super CC scaling of almost 9 % K −1 in line with studies over land (e.g., Bürger et al, 2014;Schroeer and Kirchengast, 2018), while for ERA5 the 99th percentile of the hourly ERA5 precipitation rates increases by only 4.5 % K −1 (linear regression using Theil-Sen estimator). The tendency of a stronger scaling with higher temporal sampling confirms findings by Utsumi et al (2011) and Drobinski et al (2016).…”
Section: Summary and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For OceanRAIN, the 99th percentile of 1 min precipitation rates shows a super CC scaling of almost 9 % K −1 in line with studies over land (e.g., Bürger et al, 2014;Schroeer and Kirchengast, 2018), while for ERA5 the 99th percentile of the hourly ERA5 precipitation rates increases by only 4.5 % K −1 (linear regression using Theil-Sen estimator). The tendency of a stronger scaling with higher temporal sampling confirms findings by Utsumi et al (2011) and Drobinski et al (2016).…”
Section: Summary and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This may be attributed to the similar nature of satellite-based products and to the pixel-to-pixel comparison (with respect to the point-to-pixel comparison used in the OceanRain analysis). Although the along-track averaged precipitation of OceanRAIN provides better representation of the areal extent of satellite measurements, the track-to-area difference could be minimized by statistical adjustments as proposed by Burdanowitz et al [20]. Overall, this does not point to a conclusive evidence as to which reference (OceanRAIN or 3DPRD) should be used for validating the IMERG products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…IMERG V03 has been evaluated against OceanRAIN precipitation and showed an underestimation of shallow tropical rainfall [19]. Another recent study used OceanRAIN precipitation data for evaluating the HOAPS (Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and fluxes from Satellite data) precipitation product across the Atlantic Ocean [20]. This study highlighted that the differences between HOAPS and OceanRAIN are governed by the point-to-area (along track-pixel) effect rather than the precipitation regime itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No attempt was made to match observations exactly in space and time due to the difficulty of point-to-area comparisons with ship-borne data and GPM (Burdanowitz et al, 2018;Loew et al, 2017). The right panel of Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To Gpmmentioning
confidence: 99%