2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Aircraft with Reduced Lateral Static Stability Using Differential Thrust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages of HEP include emission-free missions or flight phases [1][2][3], optimization of powertrain efficiency through electrically-assisted propulsion [4], and the possibility to efficiently distribute power to different locations on the airframe. This last benefit is commonly referred to as distributed propulsion (DP) [5], which enables advanced propulsion-system layouts with increased aero-propulsive efficiency [6,7], reduced noise emissions through shielding [8], or enhanced high-lift [6,9] and control [10] capabilities. However, due to the battery weight penalty associated to many hybrid-electric powertrains, most design studies evaluate reduced ranges [2,3,11,12] or require battery technology levels which are inconceivable in the near future [13][14][15] in order to make these aircraft concepts viable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of HEP include emission-free missions or flight phases [1][2][3], optimization of powertrain efficiency through electrically-assisted propulsion [4], and the possibility to efficiently distribute power to different locations on the airframe. This last benefit is commonly referred to as distributed propulsion (DP) [5], which enables advanced propulsion-system layouts with increased aero-propulsive efficiency [6,7], reduced noise emissions through shielding [8], or enhanced high-lift [6,9] and control [10] capabilities. However, due to the battery weight penalty associated to many hybrid-electric powertrains, most design studies evaluate reduced ranges [2,3,11,12] or require battery technology levels which are inconceivable in the near future [13][14][15] in order to make these aircraft concepts viable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to mention that the evolution of the steady state gain as a function of δ v is close to linear. This effect was anticipated in [22] where it was shown that a variation of surface area at constant aspect ratio translates as a linear variation of lateral coefficients.…”
Section: Variation Of Vertical Tail Surface Area and Motor Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…with C L,v β the lift slope of a swept wing determined using Diederich formula for swept wing [8]. K F , K W and K H are corrective coefficients accounting respectively for the fuselage, the wing and the horizontal tail geometry and position [22], [23]. The advantage of this method lies in the fact that it is a direct method, allowing to modify the vertical tail geometry and update the aircraft aerodynamic coefficients rapidly.…”
Section: Aircraft Aerodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nguyen Van et al [24,25] investigated differential thrust and vertical tail reduction through flight envelope and stability analysis, without aero-propulsive interactions or dynamic simulations. The main aim of these studies was to develop a methodology to size the vertical tailplane for reduced lateral static stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%