2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards affordable on-track testing for autonomous vehicle — A Kriging-based statistical approach

Abstract: This paper discusses the use of Kriging model in Automated Vehicle evaluation. We explore how a Kriging model can help reduce the number of experiments or simulations in the Accelerated Evaluation procedure. We also propose an adaptive sampling scheme for selecting samples to construct the Kriging model. Application examples in the lane change scenario are presented to illustrate the proposed methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6, where we use yellow asterisk to represent the experiments from h 1 . Compared to the response surface in Fig 5, this response surface has better prediction in the region [4,5], while it has a similar response in rest of the design space. The improvement of the tail region further decreased the MSE to 0.0087 (compare to 0.0093 in Fig 5).…”
Section: A Illustration Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6, where we use yellow asterisk to represent the experiments from h 1 . Compared to the response surface in Fig 5, this response surface has better prediction in the region [4,5], while it has a similar response in rest of the design space. The improvement of the tail region further decreased the MSE to 0.0087 (compare to 0.0093 in Fig 5).…”
Section: A Illustration Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We observe that the mean of the response surface (blue solid line) is not close to the real function (green dash line) in most part of the region (e.g. [−5, 1] and [4,5]) and the 95% confidence interval (red dot line) does not contain the real function in [−1, 3]. Note that the Kriging model is built with only 4 data points (the Fig.…”
Section: A Illustration Examplementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations