Towards advancing African management scholarship

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address the main arguments put forward in Grietjie Verhoef’s article and contribute to a wider debate among management scholars on the role of indigenous theories. It challenges the view of African management as illusory and points to the rising support for indigenous theories as indicative of the weakening of the unquestioned dominance of universal theories. Design/methodology/approach This paper takes a conceptual and critically reflective approach, underpinned by a 360-degree evaluation of pertinent literature and theoretical arguments. Findings This paper reveals an underlying symmetry and interconnectedness, anchored on a shared communal ethos, among Afrocentric management concepts, specifically Ubuntu, Ekpe and Igbo apprenticeship systems. This symmetry points to an underlying indigenous management theory that begs to be further conceptualised, evidenced and advanced. Research limitations/implications This paper affirms Verhoef’s demand for Ubuntu, Ekpe, Igbo apprenticeship system to be more rigorously developed and theoretically coherent and urges scholars to intensify effort towards advancing the conceptual and empirical foundations of African management. Echoing Mahatma Gandhi’s timeless counsel, this paper calls on critics of African management to join the effort to bring about the change they wish to see in African management theorising. Social implications This paper disavows the alleged effort to impose a single “African management” model or perpetuate the “colonial/indigenous” binary divide but equally cautions against an effort to veto scholarly striving for a common identity, to learn from history or not embrace collective amnesia. As examples from the USA and Europe show, diversity, even heterogeneity, needs not to preclude the forging of a commonly shared identity complemented with appropriate sub-identities. Originality/value This paper links the African management-centred themes addressed by Verhoef to the wider debate among management scholars about lessening the dominance of universal theories and allowing space for context-resonant indigenous theories. It calls on African management scholars to invest the premium and intensified effort towards building a more robust and coherent body of indigenous theory that will have the capacity and efficacy to inform, explain and advance organisational practice and outcomes across Africa.

Challenges and Perspectives of Intercultural Ethics In the Theory of Global Management

“…It is obvious that in the traditions of Western and Eastern cultures, the concept of pluralism is deeply rooted and is associated with the most frequent variety of interpretations of one and the same thing -idea, system, ethical standards, when different interpretations, attitudes, ultimately lead to the understanding of one and the same thing. Pluralism of interpretations is superior to other types of pluralisms: firstly, this type of pluralism can reduce radical differences to one harmonious understanding of some subject, secondly, pluralism of interpretations connects the ancient cultures of the East and West and becomes a sustainable basis for ethical dialogue (Ibeh;Eyong;Amaeshi, 2021). It can be argued that some classical Western and Eastern ethical theories, such as Aristotle's virtue ethics, Confucianism, Buddhism, African ubuntu philosophy, Confucianism, etc.…”

Race, class, gender and social entrepreneurship: extending the positionality of icons

“…In subsequent periods, lists of iconic figures have rarely included Black women from any time period. Only in the past few years have management scholars explicitly analyzed the impact of African American and African origin management concepts on American management thought and practice (Prieto and Phipps, 2019; Ibeh et al , 2022).…”

The singular touchstone: the enduring relevance of The Evolution of Management Thought

“…An early occurrence of this critical trend emerged when Cooke (2003) published his work on slavery, which argued – in part – that slavery’s existence has been denied in the management and business history literature. Some other scholars have also challenged Wren and Bedeian – either directly or indirectly – for ignoring the importance of women (Williams and Mills, 2017), African management and black history (Prieto and Phipps, 2019) and having a colonial flair (Ibeh et al , 2022). These new constituencies decentered the scholarly community toward a clash of different perspectives (Helms Mills and Mills, 2021).…”