2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Adapting XCS for Imbalance Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baseline XCSR performed very poorly in highly output-biased environments. By tuning XCSR and also disabling either types of subsumption, performance was improved and acceptable and comparable to two other XCSR variants designed based on the suggestions of Nguyen et al [4] and Orriols-Puig and Bernadó-Mansilla [5]. However, all of these three variants only managed to get acceptable performances provided that they are trained for a very large number of trials, specially for the highly output-biased problems (for instance, about 2.2 million trials needed at the 96% output bias value).…”
Section: Output Biasmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Baseline XCSR performed very poorly in highly output-biased environments. By tuning XCSR and also disabling either types of subsumption, performance was improved and acceptable and comparable to two other XCSR variants designed based on the suggestions of Nguyen et al [4] and Orriols-Puig and Bernadó-Mansilla [5]. However, all of these three variants only managed to get acceptable performances provided that they are trained for a very large number of trials, specially for the highly output-biased problems (for instance, about 2.2 million trials needed at the 96% output bias value).…”
Section: Output Biasmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…3 and 4 are two variants of XCSR specifically modified to handle output-biased environments. The first, by Nguyen et al [8], modifies three baseline XCSR control parameters: two of which are set to different constant values (α: 0.05, ν: 10) and the third ( 0) is calculated based on the inverse of the output bias level. Its performance is plotted using a brown solid line decorated with circles.…”
Section: Experiments 3: Output Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%