2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-017-0340-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Unified View of Inhomogeneous Stellar Winds in Isolated Supergiant Stars and Supergiant High Mass X-Ray Binaries

Abstract: Massive stars, at least ∼ 10 times more massive than the Sun, have two key properties that make them the main drivers of evolution of star clusters, galaxies, and the Universe as a whole. On the one hand, the outer layers of massive stars are so hot that they produce most of the ionizing ultraviolet radiation of galaxies; in fact, the first massive stars helped to re-ionize the Universe after its Dark Ages. Another important property of massive stars are the strong stellar winds and outflows they produce. This… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 363 publications
(375 reference statements)
2
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…c) The emission geometry of GRO J1008−57 is unknown and, thus, we assume isotropic emission of each pole into its hemisphere, i.e., g = 2π (the theoretical expectations apply to one pole only). According to Martínez-Núñez et al (2017), who estimate the effects of light bending (e.g., Kraus 2001), the real luminosity for a typical fan beam accretion geometry can differ by ∼25% relative to the derived luminosity assuming isotropic emission. Due to the higher accretion rate in BeXRBs compared to low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs), which usually emit via a pencil beam geometry (see, e.g., Basko & Sunyaev 1975), the fan beam is a justified geometry for GRO J1008−57.…”
Section: Accretion Regimes In Gro J1008−57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c) The emission geometry of GRO J1008−57 is unknown and, thus, we assume isotropic emission of each pole into its hemisphere, i.e., g = 2π (the theoretical expectations apply to one pole only). According to Martínez-Núñez et al (2017), who estimate the effects of light bending (e.g., Kraus 2001), the real luminosity for a typical fan beam accretion geometry can differ by ∼25% relative to the derived luminosity assuming isotropic emission. Due to the higher accretion rate in BeXRBs compared to low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs), which usually emit via a pencil beam geometry (see, e.g., Basko & Sunyaev 1975), the fan beam is a justified geometry for GRO J1008−57.…”
Section: Accretion Regimes In Gro J1008−57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind-fed HMXBs are of particular interest (for recent reviews see Martínez-Núñez et al 2017 andSander 2018). Here the compact object is situated in and accretes solely from the wind of the massive star, usually a supergiant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donor star in this system has the same spectral type as J Pup and the estimated distance is 6−26 kpc (see Martínez-Núñez et al 2017, and references therein). Given the typical parameters of a B0.5 Ib star (Sect.…”
Section: The Cir-induced Super-orbital Modulation In Sgxbsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The smaller structures, referred to as "clumps", are typically endowed with an increased density of a factor of 10 compared to a smooth wind and can be as large as ∼0.1 R * , where R * is the OB supergiant radius. Clumps are usually invoked to interpret the stochastic X-ray variability displayed by SgXBs on time scales of 10−1000 s (see, e.g., Martínez-Núñez et al 2017, and references therein). The existence of larger structures in the OB supergiant winds was suggested in the early 80 s (Mullan 1984), and confirmed by the detection of discrete absorption components (DACs; see, e.g., Underhill 1975).…”
Section: Corotating Interaction Regions Around Ob Supergiantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation