Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1977
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(77)90825-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a unified microscopic description of nuclear deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
184
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
184
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum phase transitions occur in atomic nuclei as a function of the number of protons or neutrons and describe changes of the ground-state shapes [2]. The so-called A % 100 mass region of the nuclear chart around 100 Zr is one of the most popular regions for the study of this phenomenon since the zirconium (Z ¼ 40) and strontium (Z ¼ 38) isotopes undergo a shape transition from almost spherical to strongly deformed shapes when going from neutron number N ¼ 58 to N ¼ 60 [3][4][5][6][7]. This PRL 108, 062701 (2012) P…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum phase transitions occur in atomic nuclei as a function of the number of protons or neutrons and describe changes of the ground-state shapes [2]. The so-called A % 100 mass region of the nuclear chart around 100 Zr is one of the most popular regions for the study of this phenomenon since the zirconium (Z ¼ 40) and strontium (Z ¼ 38) isotopes undergo a shape transition from almost spherical to strongly deformed shapes when going from neutron number N ¼ 58 to N ¼ 60 [3][4][5][6][7]. This PRL 108, 062701 (2012) P…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the known cases given in literature, the results are consistent within the experimental uncertainties. A new lifetime result for the 4 1 phase transition occurs also in Sr isotopes similarly to the Zr isotopes at N = 60, as a consequence of the type II shell evolution involving many proton particle-hole excitations to the g 9/2 orbit from the pf shell. A comparison with three published energy density functional based calculations yields the best agreement when using the SLy4 force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In a spherical shell-model approach, this phenomenon was first explained by the fact that once the neutron νg 7/2 orbit is being filled, the proton subshell suddenly disappears due to the νg 7/2 -πg 9/2 interaction [1]. In a Nilsson approach, the phenomenon was explained by strongly interacting proton and neutron Nilsson orbits ( [2] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite intensive e↵ort, the theoretical description of these structural changes is not yet fully understood and the mechanisms that drive structural evolution di↵er between models. Within the shell-model picture, the tensor and central forces modify single-particle energies via interactions between valence proton and neutron orbitals according to their filling and relative spin-to-orbital orientation [3,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In a mean-field conception, spherical shell gaps may be modified far from stability by increased surface di↵useness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%