2016
DOI: 10.1080/22041451.2016.1155328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a typology of hashtag publics: a large-scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
69
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…While discussions of content moderation tend to focus on the human labor (Roberts, 2017a,b) and broader politics of platforms' interventions (Gillespie, 2015, I ask how an already-marginalized community of users works around these techniques and why they might be doing so. This article also responds to recent calls for more methodological approaches to obtaining untagged content, however difficult this work may be (for similar arguments, see Mitchell et al, 2015;Bruns et al, 2016;D'heer et al, 2017). I use an innovative methodological approach to reveal the importance of untagged and evasive communication between pro-ED users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While discussions of content moderation tend to focus on the human labor (Roberts, 2017a,b) and broader politics of platforms' interventions (Gillespie, 2015, I ask how an already-marginalized community of users works around these techniques and why they might be doing so. This article also responds to recent calls for more methodological approaches to obtaining untagged content, however difficult this work may be (for similar arguments, see Mitchell et al, 2015;Bruns et al, 2016;D'heer et al, 2017). I use an innovative methodological approach to reveal the importance of untagged and evasive communication between pro-ED users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As-yet unaddressed issues include: (1) analyses of users' comments on pro-ED posts, (2) a cross-platform analysis to understand any socio-technical variation between different pro-ED cultures, and (3) analyses of pro-ED users' self-representations, which are often enacted pseudonymously. Future research on pro-ED should move away from a reliance on tagged datasets (see Mitchell et al, 2015;Bruns et al, 2016;D'heer et al, 2017 for similar arguments) and aim to produce knowledge about social media users that might only be understood by analyzing untagged posts. 1 I use the term 'pro-ED' throughout this article to capture the range of known eating disordersanorexia, avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), binge eating disorder, bulimia, eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS), orthorexia, and others (NEDA, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By providing access to a considerable amount of political talk centered on specific issues, hashtags and keywords allow one to gain detailed insights into the ways users mobilize and make meaning around political concerns. This overdependence on the convenience that such datasets provides, however, has received criticism for dismissing the less explicit forms of political engagement that happen between ordinary citizens (Bruns, Moon, Paul, & Münch, 2016;Wright et al, 2015). This limitation becomes increasingly problematic when it comes to countries that leverage dissident tweets as criminal offense.…”
Section: Wordplays Screenshots and Analogies: Researching Dissent Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociālo mediju potenciāls plašāka mēroga sociālo pārmaiņu veicināšanai ir pētīts salīdzinoši daudz kopš t. s. Arābu pavasara norisēm Tuvajos Austrumos, lai gan pētījumu ģeogrāfiskais tvērums ar laiku kļuvis plašāks. Gadījumi, kuros aktīvisti izmantojoši sociālos medijus politiskajā aktīvismā, novēroti Spānijā, Grieķijā, Turcijā, Azerbaidžānā, Singapūrā, Dienvidāfrikā un aSV (Bocsh, 2017;Bruns et al, 2016;Gerbaudo, 2017;Karpf, 2012;Penney & Dadas, 2013). Pētnieki norāda, ka interneta aktīvisms sekmē «pagrīdes aktivitātes» autoritāros režīmos, piemēram, Ķīnā (Wallis, 2011;Yang, 2014).…”
Section: Stratēģiskās Komunikācijas Pieejasunclassified