Towards a Typology of Corporate Responsibility in Different Governance Contexts

Abstract

This paper develops a typology of different country governance contexts, in which we propose four broad categories of countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our analysis measures the most appropriate methods for helping to create a climate that is receptive to fostering corporate accountability. Our criteria are based on several different factors, none of which is determinative: the natural resources of the country; the country's dependence on one commodity; the corruption level; the stability and accountability of the government; the state of civil society; and the existence of ongoing conflict.Examining these factors together results in measuring not just the country's receptivity to change, but also the means for producing change.At one end of the spectrum, what we label "Category 0" countries, are nations with economies and governments that are so poorly managed that there is little multinational investment -sometimes even in the context of lucrative investment opportunities. At the other end lie those countries with acceptable levels of good governance, more developed economies and markets, and with, consequently, a comparatively high level of both domestic and multinational corporate investment. We