2008 Second International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science 2008
DOI: 10.1109/rcis.2008.4632088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a tile based LfP semantics

Abstract: LIP (Language for Prototyping) is an ADL (Architecture Description Language) with a hierarchical and modular structure. In this paper, we propose tile logic (a rewriting logic extension) as a suitable semantic framework for this language. Indeed, it contributes to the formalization of LiP by providing a natural description for concurrency, synchronization and hierarchical composition aspects. A straight consequence of this work is the possibility to describe reconfigurable LiP architectures, and to handle with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, they have been used with success to model in detail several application classes such as coordination languages (triggers and effects represent coordination protocols) and software architecture styles [13,14]. This paper contributes to another meaningful and interesting application of Tile logic, it generalizes the approach proposed in [15] by defining a common formal Arrows a and b decorating tile α (in Figure 1) are also algebraic structures, they define observable effects (actions) for coordinating local rewrites through configuration interfaces (input and output ones).…”
Section: Tile Logic For Architecture Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, they have been used with success to model in detail several application classes such as coordination languages (triggers and effects represent coordination protocols) and software architecture styles [13,14]. This paper contributes to another meaningful and interesting application of Tile logic, it generalizes the approach proposed in [15] by defining a common formal Arrows a and b decorating tile α (in Figure 1) are also algebraic structures, they define observable effects (actions) for coordinating local rewrites through configuration interfaces (input and output ones).…”
Section: Tile Logic For Architecture Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 90%