Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001

Abstract

Traditionally, the transport literature reflects the view that traffic volumes, road traffic volumes in particular, are coupled with Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recently published literature also argues that the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from transport, passenger cars in particular, have not shown any decoupling from transport volumes for some years. This article presents a theoretical framework for decoupling, defining the difference between decoupling, coupling and negative decoupling. These are further broken down to weak, strong and expansive/recessive degrees of decoupling, laying emphasis on the absolute increase or decrease of the variables. The result section presents data of the development of the relationships between GDP, traffic volumes and CO 2 emissions from transport in the EU15 countries between 1970 and 2001, including the special case of Finnish road traffic. The aggregate EU15 data show a change from expansive negative decoupling to expansive coupling regarding passenger transport, and from weak decoupling to expansive negative decoupling regarding freight transport. Weak decoupling of transport CO 2 emissions from GDP could also be observed. Weak decoupling of all the three aspects (freight, passenger and CO 2 ) could be seen in the UK, Sweden and Finland in the 1990s. In Finland, the statistics show weak decoupling of GDP from road traffic volume and strong decoupling of road traffic volume and CO 2 emissions from road traffic between 1990 and 2001. Four hypothetical explanations of the Finnish phenomenon are put forward in this article: policy towards sustainable mobility, green urban lifestyle, increasing income differences, and statistical misinterpretation. Each explanation is backed up with some quantitative evidence in observable trends in Finland during the 1990s. q

Eco-Efficiency Trends and Decoupling Analysis of Environmental Pressures in Tianjin, China

“…The first model focuses on the decoupling factor introduced by the OECD [14] and the second, formulated by Tapio, is based on the concept of elasticity. In economics, elasticity is calculated as the ratio of the percent change in one variable to the percent change in another variable during a given time period [18,19]. This decoupling model is expressed by the following formula:…”

“…The %ΔGDP denotes the growth rate of GDP from the last phase to the base period, and GDPi and GDPi − 1 represent the GDP of years i and i − 1, respectively. Table 1 shows eight possible decoupling states based on the decoupling elasticity value [18,29]. Coupling occurs when the decoupling elastic coefficient value falls within the range of 0.8-1.2, implying that the dependence of economic growth on environmental impacts is reinforced.…”

“…Conrad and Cassar have investigated the decoupling of economic growth and environmental degradation in Malta [17]. To investigate the degree of the decoupling effect in the EU, Tapio [18] has introduced elasticity theory into the decoupling index and extended the theoretical framework of decoupling analysis. Wang et al, have examined conditions for the decoupling of the domestic extraction of materials, energy use, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the GDP of four selected countries [19].…”

Degrowth by means of technology? A treatise for an ethos of releasement

“…The success claimed for decoupling economic growth from ecological damage is based on selected data in terms of geographical context (see e.g. Zhang, 2000;Tapio, 2005;de Freitas and Kaneko, 2011). The problem with such research designs is that the outsourced production (input) and exportation of waste (output) to other countries are excluded from the calculus.…”

“Decoupling” Indicators for Evaluation of Urban Low-Carbon Economy Development: a Case Study of Shanghai

“…The "decoupling" indicators of the development of a low-carbon economy was a good try. Referred to the conceptual model of decoupling and coupling [6,7], "decoupling" indicators of energy consumption and economic growth was selected to reflect the response relationship between economic growth and the changes of resources in this paper, including three indicators: Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the total amount of energy consumption (TEC) and the energy consumption per unit of GDP (TEC/GDP). Similarly, "decoupling" indicators of carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth were chosen to reflect the response relationship between economic growth and the changes of environment, including three indicators: Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the total amount of carbon dioxide emission (CO 2 ) and the carbon dioxide emission per unit of GDP (CO 2 /GDP).…”