2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-021-01843-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Standard Feature Set for Network Intrusion Detection System Datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…of Classes), the proportion of classification or detection accuracy (ACC%), the proportion of positive predictive value (PPV%), and the proportion of true positive rate (TPR%). Also, nine intelligent IoT-IDS-systems are deemed in this assessment as engaging diverse supervised ML systems containing: Extremely Randomized Trees (XRT) Classifier [ 35 ], Statistical Learning (STL) Classifier [ 36 ], eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) Classifier [ 37 , 40 ], Hybrid ML Scheme combining decision trees, random forests, and Naïve bays algorithms (HYB) Classifier [ 38 ], shallow convolutional neural networks (S-CNN) Classifier [ 39 , 60 ], Classification And Regression Trees (CART) Classifier [ 41 ], k-nearest neighbor (kNN) Classifier, and our best system employing ensemble boosted trees (EBT) Classifier. According to the information provided in the table, it can be clearly inferred that our model is prominent as it recorded the best performance results among all other schemes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of Classes), the proportion of classification or detection accuracy (ACC%), the proportion of positive predictive value (PPV%), and the proportion of true positive rate (TPR%). Also, nine intelligent IoT-IDS-systems are deemed in this assessment as engaging diverse supervised ML systems containing: Extremely Randomized Trees (XRT) Classifier [ 35 ], Statistical Learning (STL) Classifier [ 36 ], eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) Classifier [ 37 , 40 ], Hybrid ML Scheme combining decision trees, random forests, and Naïve bays algorithms (HYB) Classifier [ 38 ], shallow convolutional neural networks (S-CNN) Classifier [ 39 , 60 ], Classification And Regression Trees (CART) Classifier [ 41 ], k-nearest neighbor (kNN) Classifier, and our best system employing ensemble boosted trees (EBT) Classifier. According to the information provided in the table, it can be clearly inferred that our model is prominent as it recorded the best performance results among all other schemes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work, the authors in [ 35 ] tried to provide a standard feature set for NIDSs. The authors collected two NetFlow-based feature sets and converted four commonly used NIDS datasets (See Table 2 ) to conform with the collected datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 shows a comparison with previous works, including papers [ 16 , 23 , 28 , 29 ]. These papers were selected because they relied on feature importance in performing feature selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, Sarhan et al proposed a standard feature set for network intrusion detection datasets [ 16 ]. The paper focused on general network flow-based intrusion detection including IoT intrusions, as well as other network intrusions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 benchmark NIDS datasets are used in our experiments: NF-UNSW-NB15-v2 and NF-CSE-CIC-IDS2018-v2. These are both updated versions of existing NIDS datasets that have been standardised into a NetFlow format [28] by Sarhan et al [29]. Further details on each dataset are as follows:…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%