2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a SOLAP-based public participation GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…SOLAP. While On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP) technologies allow fast, easy, and interactive exploration and analysis of data without any expert assistance [8,7], they are not optimized to spatial data. On the other hand, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are powerful tools for detailed spatial data analysis, but they are not meant to support analytical needs which mostly require summarized information, aggregated data, trends analysis, spatio-temporal comparisons, interactive exploration of data, geographic knowledge discovery in large amounts of data, etc.…”
Section: Multiple-level Analysis Of Spatial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOLAP. While On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP) technologies allow fast, easy, and interactive exploration and analysis of data without any expert assistance [8,7], they are not optimized to spatial data. On the other hand, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are powerful tools for detailed spatial data analysis, but they are not meant to support analytical needs which mostly require summarized information, aggregated data, trends analysis, spatio-temporal comparisons, interactive exploration of data, geographic knowledge discovery in large amounts of data, etc.…”
Section: Multiple-level Analysis Of Spatial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, some spatial extensions have been proposed for OLAPs so as to view the geographical data of data warehouses on maps (Bimonte et al 2006;McHugh et al 2009). These tools are of significant interest in fields such as agriculture and the environment.…”
Section: Integrity Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participatory and collaborative GIS have, for instance, raised this challenge (Jankowski and Nyerges, 2001;Balram and Dragićević, 2006). The next generation of tools requires easy-to-use interactive interfaces so that GIS analysts are not needed to formulate queries, produce charts, and generate maps on behalf of the users (McHugh et al, 2009). MCDA methods must also be easy to use and understand, yet many available methods are perceived by decision makers as being a black box (Belton and Stewart, 2002;Kangas and Kangas, 2005;Løken, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%