1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb00622.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a sociology of tranquillizer prescribing

Abstract: This paper outlines a sociological approach to benzodiazepine tranquillizer prescribing. The analysis focuses on both the micro level of the doctor-patient relationship and the macro level of those political, economic and cultural factors which structure the prescribing process. This makes it possible to account for both the overall decline in benzodiazepine prescriptions in the 1980's and the fact that they are still being prescribed on a long-term basis to a significant number of people.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the late 1980s, however, it made more sense for drug companies to market products aimed at the wide array of stress conditions as “antidepressants” rather than “anxiolytics.” A sharp backlash against the anxiolytic drugs had developed in the early 1970s when the media turned sharply against their use, showing in many stories their addictive potential, use in suicide attempts, and other negative side effects. In response, patients, with backing by organized advocacy groups, filed numerous lawsuits against the manufacturers of these drugs (Gabe 1990). In addition, the rise of the feminist movement, which harshly assailed these drugs because of their assumed role in upholding patriarchal norms and keeping women confined in oppressive social roles, was another nail in the tranquilizers’ coffin (Herzberg 2009).…”
Section: How Depression Captured the Stress Marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the late 1980s, however, it made more sense for drug companies to market products aimed at the wide array of stress conditions as “antidepressants” rather than “anxiolytics.” A sharp backlash against the anxiolytic drugs had developed in the early 1970s when the media turned sharply against their use, showing in many stories their addictive potential, use in suicide attempts, and other negative side effects. In response, patients, with backing by organized advocacy groups, filed numerous lawsuits against the manufacturers of these drugs (Gabe 1990). In addition, the rise of the feminist movement, which harshly assailed these drugs because of their assumed role in upholding patriarchal norms and keeping women confined in oppressive social roles, was another nail in the tranquilizers’ coffin (Herzberg 2009).…”
Section: How Depression Captured the Stress Marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time becomes a factor in doctor/patient consultations, with the increased workload and the daily pressures of not only patient care, but also the independent management of their surgeries and the advent of fund‐holding. These pressures of work often result in prescriptions for patients as it is sometimes seen as an ‘easy option’ as opposed to a lengthy consultation and negotiating alternative treatments ( Gabe 1990). A prescription can offer a ‘quick fix’ for both the patient and the doctor, making it preferable end to a five minute consultation ( Lipton & Bero 1991.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wake of these debates, the volatile alliance between "mental disorders" and "psychosocial problems" is one area in which pharmacological non-specificity is most resistant to the canonical model of "one drug, one disease". Important studies have been published on the sociology or the history of psychotropic drug use since the 1980s (Montagne, 2001;Gabe, 1990;Ettorre et al, 1994). Moreover, in the past decade or so, the history of psychiatric drug treatment has inspired a number of significant publications (Horwitz, 2010;Shorter, 2009;Herzberg, 2009;Tone, 2009;Moncrieff, 2008;Healy, 2004).…”
Section: The Issue Of Contemporary Anxiety-depressive Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%