2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a risk evaluation of workers’ exposure to handborne and airborne microbial species as exemplified with waste collection workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In eight of them, it was not possible to identify the section detected with culture-based methods. This finding corroborates the need to apply both methods in parallel to achieve a better characterization of Aspergillus sections, thus overcoming the limitations of each method [2,22,[29][30][31]63,64]. Indeed, culture-based methods provide information on the viable/culturable form required to estimate health risks, as it affects biological mechanisms, such as the cytotoxic and inflammatory responses [65], while molecular tools allow a rapid identification and are being gradually used to obtain data on the microbial biodiversity in different indoor environments [63].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In eight of them, it was not possible to identify the section detected with culture-based methods. This finding corroborates the need to apply both methods in parallel to achieve a better characterization of Aspergillus sections, thus overcoming the limitations of each method [2,22,[29][30][31]63,64]. Indeed, culture-based methods provide information on the viable/culturable form required to estimate health risks, as it affects biological mechanisms, such as the cytotoxic and inflammatory responses [65], while molecular tools allow a rapid identification and are being gradually used to obtain data on the microbial biodiversity in different indoor environments [63].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Despite these observations, molecular tools are generally a suitable solution to overcome the nonviable/nonculturable limits of the commonly used culture-based methods as they might also provide a more exhaustive diversity profile (e.g., high throughput sequencing), unlike culture methods that might reveal less abundant taxa in an environment. However, culture-independent molecular methods often only identify most of the organisms until taxonomic levels [60,61] and this level of identification is insufficient for exposure assessment. Furthermore, it has already been reported that the viability of microorganisms can affect their inflammatory and/or cytotoxic potential and only viable microorganisms can cause infections, justifying the preference of culture-based methods [62][63][64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspergillus fumigatus is the species more frequently associated with respiratory symptoms, especially due to the small size of the conidia and other virulence factors, such as gliotoxin production, associated with this species. However, besides the infection ability, risk assessment should consider the toxigenic potential of species belonging to Aspergillus genus [17]. Thus, species or strains belonging to sections Circumdati, Flavi, Nigri, and Nidulantes must be considered in the risk assessment, since they include species that produce mycotoxins [7,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sampling methods can be used to perform the Aspergillus assessment, as was already reported [12,15,17,23]. Active sampling methods (air sampling), although the most used method in sampling campaigns, can only reflect the load from a shorter period of time (mostly minutes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation