2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2014.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Reflective Practicum of Embodied Conversational Agent Experiences

Abstract: A reflective practicum is a low-pressure, low-risk learning environment. In a reflective practicum a learner is educated in a professional practice and how to use reflection in the setting of that professional practice. An example of a low-pressure and low-risk learning environment is the use of embodied conversational agents (ECAs) in medicine to provide training for interviewing and diagnostic skills. However, such ECA experiences have not been used to teach how to use reflection in the setting of a professi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kleinsmith et al (2015), Rivera-Gutierrez et al (2014), Lyons, Johnson, Khalil, and Cendan (2014), and Johnson et al (2014Johnson et al ( , 2013 report findings from controlled experiments completed during the first four years of R&D that compared various aspects of VP simulations to inform the design of the system and advanced VP simulation research, such as individual versus small group use of the system, use of the system under competitive versus non-competitive conditions, the use of reflective questions embedded during versus after the simulation, instructor-led content delivery versus independent self-study of the content prior to use, and the use of an open-chat versus closed menu user interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kleinsmith et al (2015), Rivera-Gutierrez et al (2014), Lyons, Johnson, Khalil, and Cendan (2014), and Johnson et al (2014Johnson et al ( , 2013 report findings from controlled experiments completed during the first four years of R&D that compared various aspects of VP simulations to inform the design of the system and advanced VP simulation research, such as individual versus small group use of the system, use of the system under competitive versus non-competitive conditions, the use of reflective questions embedded during versus after the simulation, instructor-led content delivery versus independent self-study of the content prior to use, and the use of an open-chat versus closed menu user interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%