2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a quantitative understanding of pyroclastic flows: Effects of expansion on the dynamics of laboratory fluidized granular flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where c1 and c2 were empirical constants that increased with the pore pressure diffusion timescale. Other dam-break experiments with synthetic or pyroclastic material showed that the flow runout and duration increased with the initial amount of material expansion (Girolami et al 2008(Girolami et al , 2015, suggesting that flow deflation increased the pore pressure diffusion timescale, in agreement with experiments on static granular columns (Montserrat et al 2012, Roche 2012. The experiments also revealed that deposition of the particles occurred through progressive aggradation whose rate decreased with the initial material expansion (Girolami et al 2008, Roche 2012.…”
Section: Figure 21supporting
confidence: 72%
“…where c1 and c2 were empirical constants that increased with the pore pressure diffusion timescale. Other dam-break experiments with synthetic or pyroclastic material showed that the flow runout and duration increased with the initial amount of material expansion (Girolami et al 2008(Girolami et al , 2015, suggesting that flow deflation increased the pore pressure diffusion timescale, in agreement with experiments on static granular columns (Montserrat et al 2012, Roche 2012. The experiments also revealed that deposition of the particles occurred through progressive aggradation whose rate decreased with the initial material expansion (Girolami et al 2008, Roche 2012.…”
Section: Figure 21supporting
confidence: 72%
“…By assuming that dam-break and particle sedimentation are independent, we derive mathematical expressions that relate together the global characteristics of the phenomenon: front velocity U F , sedimenting velocity U sed , overall flow duration T , height h d∞ and length L of the final deposit. These relations are validated by revisiting previous laboratory experiments conducted with volcanic ash by one of the authors [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Surprisingly, the values of U sed and U agg measured during the mixture is flowing are found to be constant both in time and all along the channel [12][13][14][15]. Moreover, they are also equal to those determined in the same mixture sedimenting while confined without flowing within the locked reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Huppert and Simpson 1980;Shin et al 2004) and gas-particle (e.g. Roche et al 2010;Girolami et al 2015) flows resulting from dam break collapse. The densimetric Froude number in the collapse and that in the shear flow are directly related to each other, depending on particle accumulation and 3D air entrainment .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect depends on higher versus lower particle sedimentation rate, respectively, and it is also clear that the three particle sizes differently contribute to the local sedimentation rate (Valentine et al 2011). On the other hand, the 3D building effect on particle sedimentation is to keep in mind when considering our exponential law for the deposits, in that the buildings certainly affected the particle dispersion by flow Girolami et al (2015) and Lube et al (2015), and with the numerical finding of . In pyroclastic density currents, temperature may be higher in the forced regime instead (Sulpizio et al 2014, p. 57; see also Caricchi et al 2014).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%