2013 6th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/relaw.2013.6671345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a process for legally compliant software

Abstract: We propose a method and a process for legal software requirements extraction and compliance checking. We describe a requirements extraction model, a set of rules for specifying the format of the extracted information, a set of UML-based principles for translating the extracted information into a language based on predicate logic, and finally, a tool that analyzes the resulting logic model and displays the results of the analysis. The translation principles are based on a Governance Analysis Model (GAM) which i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already stated, it is critical for companies to ensure that their businesses conform to relevant policies, laws, and regulations as the consequences of infringement can be serious. A method and a process for legal software requirements extraction and compliance checking is proposed in Hassan and Logrippo . The paper shows a requirements extraction model, a set of rules for specifying the format of the extracted information, a set of UML‐based principles for translating the extracted information into a language based on predicate logic, and, finally, a tool that analyzes the resulting logic model and displays the results of the analysis.…”
Section: Motivations and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already stated, it is critical for companies to ensure that their businesses conform to relevant policies, laws, and regulations as the consequences of infringement can be serious. A method and a process for legal software requirements extraction and compliance checking is proposed in Hassan and Logrippo . The paper shows a requirements extraction model, a set of rules for specifying the format of the extracted information, a set of UML‐based principles for translating the extracted information into a language based on predicate logic, and, finally, a tool that analyzes the resulting logic model and displays the results of the analysis.…”
Section: Motivations and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method and a process for legal software requirements extraction and compliance checking is proposed in Hassan and Logrippo. 30 The paper shows a requirements extraction model, a set of rules for specifying the format of the extracted information, a set of UML-based principles for translating the extracted information into a language based on predicate logic, and, finally, a tool that analyzes the resulting logic model and displays the results of the analysis. The translation principles are based on a Governance Analysis Model, which is described in UML; the language is the Governance Analysis Language, and the tool is the Governance Analysis Tool.…”
Section: Of 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hassan and Logrippo developed a logic-based approach to compliance checking for requirements based on Alloy [11], [12], [13]. Their most recent work includes a model for extracting legal requirements from legal texts, a set of rules to translate those requirements into a formal logic, and tool support to analyze the resulting logical model for compliance [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their most recent work includes a model for extracting legal requirements from legal texts, a set of rules to translate those requirements into a formal logic, and tool support to analyze the resulting logical model for compliance [13]. Although this research provides a reasonably comprehensive methodology for establishing compliance in legal requirements, it does not examine how people make decisions when asked to consider regulatory compliance for software requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%