2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a predictive model of chromatin 3D organization

Abstract: Architectural proteins mediate interactions between distant regions in the genome to bring together different regulatory elements while establishing a specific three-dimensional organization of the genetic material. Depletion of specific architectural proteins leads to miss regulation of gene expression and alterations in nuclear organization. The specificity of interactions mediated by architectural proteins depends on the nature, number, and orientation of their binding site at individual genomic locations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the recent identification of the same diverging arrangement in a highly conserved TAD border that predates the origin of deuterostomes suggests that the crucial importance of CTCF orientation is probably an ancestral genomic feature . However, it is important to note that, in the case of flies, no clear association between looping and TAD borders with CTCF binding site orientation has been identified so far . Furthermore, in the highly compacted Drosophila genome, TADs are much smaller than in mammals (60 kb mean size vs 800 kb) .…”
Section: Evidence Of Widespread Tad Organization Across Bilateriansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the recent identification of the same diverging arrangement in a highly conserved TAD border that predates the origin of deuterostomes suggests that the crucial importance of CTCF orientation is probably an ancestral genomic feature . However, it is important to note that, in the case of flies, no clear association between looping and TAD borders with CTCF binding site orientation has been identified so far . Furthermore, in the highly compacted Drosophila genome, TADs are much smaller than in mammals (60 kb mean size vs 800 kb) .…”
Section: Evidence Of Widespread Tad Organization Across Bilateriansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And yet, these species have retained many ancestral microsyntenic pairs, way more than C. elegans . Thus, CTCF could have also been secondarily lost several times in non‐bilaterian lineages, but maintaining long‐range CREs by other means (i.e., evolving novel lineage‐specific architectural proteins such as the ones present in Drosophila ) . However, this seems rather unlikely, suggesting that long‐range regulation could have evolved prior to the origin of bilaterians, in the last common animal ancestor, but that initially these distant chromatin interactions depended on alternative mechanisms or architectural proteins different from CTCF.…”
Section: Evidence Of Widespread Tad Organization Across Bilateriansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In human and yeast cells, RNA polymerase III-transcribed sequences were also suggested to serve as insulator sequences with similar mechanisms as CTCF binding sequences. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Moreover, various protein binding sequences that form chromatin loops by contacting each other and also exhibit insulator activities have been found in various invertebrates. 19,20,[29][30][31][32][33][34] To precisely regulate gene expression, each enhancer associates with promoters only within the same chromatin domain, with each domain divided by insulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Moreover, various protein binding sequences that form chromatin loops by contacting each other and also exhibit insulator activities have been found in various invertebrates. 19,20,[29][30][31][32][33][34] To precisely regulate gene expression, each enhancer associates with promoters only within the same chromatin domain, with each domain divided by insulators. To explain the mechanisms underlying such physically nontrivial limitation of enhancer motion, various models of chromatin dynamics and enhancer-promoter interactions such as the tracking model for DNA binding proteins, looping model based on enhancer-promoter random collision or enhancer scanning, and the topological domain model based on enhancer-promoter random collision have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%