Airfield Pavements 2004
DOI: 10.1061/40711(141)4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Permanent ACN Solution for 6-Wheel Landing Gear Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the B747 traffic path CBR values are higher than those in B777 traffic path. The pavement layer moduli backcalculation results based on NDT data showed similar trend (Gopalakrishnan and Thompson, 2006a) indicative of subbase and subgrade compaction resulting from trafficking.…”
Section: Low-strength Subgrade Flexible Test Pavement With Conventionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the B747 traffic path CBR values are higher than those in B777 traffic path. The pavement layer moduli backcalculation results based on NDT data showed similar trend (Gopalakrishnan and Thompson, 2006a) indicative of subbase and subgrade compaction resulting from trafficking.…”
Section: Low-strength Subgrade Flexible Test Pavement With Conventionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…According to the FAA, the primary objective of the NAPTF trafficking tests was to determine the number of load applications While the medium-strength subgrade test sections were declared to be failed at the subgrade level, the LFC and LFS sections failed in the surface layers, signifying tire pressure or other upper layer failure effects, but not subgrade level failure (Gervais et al, 2003). According to Hayhoe (2004), full structural failure did not occur in the LFC and LFS test sections, probably because the subgrade material contained a significant amount of silt and the upper layers of the subgrade dried somewhat over the long period of time between construction and starting of traffic testing.…”
Section: Traffic Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total surface rutting in both the MFC and MFS test sections was primarily contributed by the subgrade Gervais et al 2004). These observations are consistent with the conclusions drawn based on the PC-based SSR analyses for the MFC and MFS test sections.…”
Section: Medium-strength Subgrade Test Sections (Mfc and Mfs)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The post-traffic trenching study on the low-strength subgrade flexible test sections revealed that these test sections failed in the surface layers, signifying tire pressure or other upper layer failure effects, but not subgrade-level shear failure (Gervais et al 2004). According to Hayhoe (2004), full structural failure did not occur in the low-strength subgrade test sections, probably because the subgrade material contained a significant amount of silt and the upper layers of the subgrade dried somewhat over the long period of time between construction and starting the traffic testing.…”
Section: Low-strength Subgrade Test Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation