2021
DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a non‐dichotomous view of motivators and demotivators in language learning

Abstract: poses learners. Data were collected over a 10-week period by means of motivation journals and focus group discussions. The findings indicate that students' motivation levels changed frequently from day to day and that motivational factors can serve as both motivators and demotivators as their strength and polarity change according to initial conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although every node, that is, motivational factor, has an impact on the overall behavior of the motivational CDS, some are more likely to steer it towards either a motivated or a demotivated attractor state. One of the findings of the larger project of which the data of this study comes from is that the majority of factors cited by the participants served as both motivators and demotivators, depending on contextual changes (Pack, Kiss, Barrett, & Chen, 2022) and only a few exerted a one‐sided motivating or demotivating force (see Table 2). Examining how these are interconnected can offer further insights into the central relational links of the system (see Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although every node, that is, motivational factor, has an impact on the overall behavior of the motivational CDS, some are more likely to steer it towards either a motivated or a demotivated attractor state. One of the findings of the larger project of which the data of this study comes from is that the majority of factors cited by the participants served as both motivators and demotivators, depending on contextual changes (Pack, Kiss, Barrett, & Chen, 2022) and only a few exerted a one‐sided motivating or demotivating force (see Table 2). Examining how these are interconnected can offer further insights into the central relational links of the system (see Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A few important observations can be made from Figure 2 concerning the positions and the connection between the most influential motivational factors in the network. First, given that data from the motivational journals show that assignments and assessments in general acted as a positive motivational force for the learners (Pack et al, 2021), it is not surprising that good desires, which also exerted a positive impact on the learners' motivation, is in close proximity. The OpenOrd algorithm is force-directed, which means that nodes and communities that are connected are pulled to each other, while those not linked are pushed apart.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this discovery warrants more research and data to be validated, this does not hold us back to consider what direction future research employing NA and CDST should take. One possible avenue could be based on the fact that certain motivational factors can exert both positive and negative influence on learner motivation (Pack et al, 2021). We suggest that future research focus on identifying driver nodes (Liu et al, 2011) which primarily exert a positive motivational force, and thus, have the potential to move the motivation system toward a more motivated state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was less evidence relating to demotivation as a newly found dimension in ELB. Studies have shown that demotivation in English learning is dynamic ( Dörnyei and Csizér, 2002 ; Song and Kim, 2017 ; Pack et al, 2022 ), and it is worth investigating the dynamics of demotivation via longitudinal quantitative or qualitative approaches in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%