Towards a new framework of personalized psychological interventions to improve intergroup relations and promote peace

Abstract

Recent increases in intergroup tensions and violence have global negative implications and underline the need for effective interventions to ameliorate conflictual relations. Despite the ongoing trend in social psychology toward an interventionist approach, there is still a theoretical and empirical gap in personalizing intergroup interventions to achieve optimal effectiveness. Integrating interventions aimed at prejudice reduction and promoting peace, we present a theoretical framework for personalizing these intergroup interventions. We propose a three-layer model: personalization parameters, intergroup interventions, and mechanisms that link parameter and intervention. To illustrate the model, three sample parameters are described (ideology, dominant emotional sentiments, and Big Five personality types) and three corresponding mechanisms (level of intervention congruency; the degree to which an intervention addresses core appraisal theme; and a needs-based mechanism). We demonstrate how the parameters and mechanisms map onto different established intergroup interventions, and suggest some empirical directions to test and later apply the theoretical framework. Finally, we discuss the potential of personalized interventions to substantially improve intergroup relations.The issue of intergroup conflicts-their creation, preservation, and escalation-has drawn the attention of social scientists in general and social psychologists more specifically for many years, leading them to research concepts such as prejudice (

Fighting Coronavirus One Personality at a Time: Need for Structure, Trait Victimhood, and Adherence to COVID-19 Health Guidelines

“…In terms of possible implications of the current research, due to the great importance of pandemic related messages, they should be perfected to lead to favorable results. In today's world, in which so many messages are imparted via social networks, social marketers trying to promote more COVID-19 related guideline adherence can enhance their messages' effectiveness using tailored, or personalized messaging (e.g., Hirsh et al, 2012;Halperin and Schori-Eyal, 2020). Indeed, the literature on attitude change has long established that the effectiveness of a message is not only based on the message itself, but also on the message source, the medium, and the characteristics of the message recipient (Hovland et al, 1953;Greenwald, 1968).…”

How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking

“…At the most basic level, programs aimed at encouraging intergroup contact could communicate contact's personal benefits for self‐expansion, social development, and professional advancement (see Dunne, 2013; Paolini et al., 2016). More complex iterations of such programs could consider the specific context in which the contact occurs and the specific parties involved (for in‐depth discussions see Halperin & Schori‐Eyal, 2020; O'Donnell et al., 2019; Turner et al., 2020).…”

“…Interventions and policies that simultaneously focus on critical (and changeable) variables at multiple levels of analysis might be most effective in ending tendencies for (re)segregation. In fact, upcoming theoretical work outlines the benefits of combining person‐ and group‐centered approaches when developing programs aimed at increasing contact seeking (Halperin & Schori‐Eyal, 2020; O'Donnell et al., 2019). Accordingly, societal norms should not only communicate that intergroup contact is frequent and desirable but could also state that intergroup contact can be beneficial in a way that satisfies individuals’ needs and motives such as self‐expansion.…”

Entertainment Education as a Means to Reduce Anti-Muslim Prejudice – For Whom Does It Work Best?

“…Still, it seems that EE can be more effective in reducing prejudice in high-RWA individuals than other well-established interventions. The present research thus offers important insights on how interventions might be tailored to the (groups of) people who are most prejudice-prone and adds to the growing body of research emphasizing the importance of audience characteristics when designing prejudice interventions (e.g., Halperin & Schori-Eyal, 2020;Mansoori-Rostam & Tate, 2017).…”