2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a new era in giant exoplanet characterisation

Abstract: Determining the composition of giant exoplanets is crucial for understanding their origin and evolution. However, planetary bulk composition is not measured directly but must be deduced from a combination of mass-radius measurements, knowledge of the planetary age and evolution simulations. Accurate determinations of stellar ages, mass-radius measurements, and atmospheric compositions from upcoming missions can significantly improve the determination of the heavy-element mass in giant planets. In this paper we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(116 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they also showed that different model parameters, such as EoS and opacity, can have a large influence on the inferred bulk metallicity of giant planets. A similar mass-metallicity trend was also found by Müller and Helled (2023) who analysed warm giants in the Ariel mission reference sample (Edwards and Tinetti, 2022). Their results suggest a lower heavy-element mass for a given planetary mass compared to Thorngren et al (2016), and also a less statistically significant correlation.…”
Section: Primordial State Energy Transport and Distribution Of Elementssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, they also showed that different model parameters, such as EoS and opacity, can have a large influence on the inferred bulk metallicity of giant planets. A similar mass-metallicity trend was also found by Müller and Helled (2023) who analysed warm giants in the Ariel mission reference sample (Edwards and Tinetti, 2022). Their results suggest a lower heavy-element mass for a given planetary mass compared to Thorngren et al (2016), and also a less statistically significant correlation.…”
Section: Primordial State Energy Transport and Distribution Of Elementssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, they also showed that different model parameters, such as EoS and opacity, can have a large influence on the inferred bulk metallicity of giant planets. A similar mass-metallicity trend was also found by Müller and Helled (2023) who analysed warm giants in the Ariel mission reference sample (Edwards and Tinetti, 2022). Their results suggest a lower heavy-element mass for a given planetary mass compared to Thorngren et al (2016), and also a less statistically significant correlation.…”
Section: Primordial State Energy Transport and Distribution Of Elementssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These are usually not included in evolution models due to their stochastic nature. However, unless collisions are frequent and violent, which is unlikely after a few Gyr, the energy deposited during the impacts is quickly re-radiated, and the planets are only inflated for a short time, up to a few 10 4 years (Müller and Helled, 2023). Nevertheless, collisions could be important for the interpretation of individual giant planets.…”
Section: Primordial State Energy Transport and Distribution Of Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has found that the assumptions underlying interior models of giant planets can cause variations in the predicted radius on the order of a few percent (for a review, see Müller & Helled 2023). The main culprits appear to be uncertainties in the H-He equations of state (Müller et al 2020a;Howard & Guillot 2023) and the opacity (Müller et al 2020a).…”
Section: Placing Toi-4201 B In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%