Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3485447.3512086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Multi-View Attentive Matching for Personalized Expert Finding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…StackExchange data has been used in several EF papers, e.g., in [8,13,17]. These works however mostly focus on solving the expert finding task for a single community.…”
Section: Se-pef Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…StackExchange data has been used in several EF papers, e.g., in [8,13,17]. These works however mostly focus on solving the expert finding task for a single community.…”
Section: Se-pef Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most works among those previously cited either rely on a private dataset, or refer to a specific domain and make very strong assumptions simplifying the task addressed. Conversely, SE-PEF will be made publicly available, it has a well-defined definition of an expert, which is inspired by reasonable hypothesis common to other works [11,13,17]. Furthermore, it provides a rich set of social features usable for personalization and combines data from multiple communities, which, as we have already stated, increases dataset diversity and opens the possibility of exploiting cross-domain user information for EF.…”
Section: Comparison With Available Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the powerful neural network (LeCun et al, 2015), many approaches (Li et al, 2019;Fu et al, 2020;Peng et al, 2022a) have been shown effective to improve the performance of expert finding. The core idea is to first model the question semantically, and then learn the expert preference based on his/her historically answered questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core idea is to first model the question semantically, and then learn the expert preference based on his/her historically answered questions. For example, Peng et al (Peng et al, 2022a) proposed PMEF equipped with a multi-view question modeling paradigm aiming to model questions more comprehensively and then capture expert features. Hence, the capacity of the designed question modeling paradigm directly affects the expert finding performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%