2017
DOI: 10.7554/elife.23804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a mechanistic foundation of evolutionary theory

Abstract: Most evolutionary thinking is based on the notion of fitness and related ideas such as fitness landscapes and evolutionary optima. Nevertheless, it is often unclear what fitness actually is, and its meaning often depends on the context. Here we argue that fitness should not be a basal ingredient in verbal or mathematical descriptions of evolution. Instead, we propose that evolutionary birth-death processes, in which individuals give birth and die at ever-changing rates, should be the basis of evolutionary theo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that by increasing the complexity of the model, the separation of ecological and evolutionary processes becomes more and more dicult. The emergence of such complexity in the intertwined nature of eco-evolutionary dynamics is a natural outcome of biological processes derived from mechanistic first principles [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that by increasing the complexity of the model, the separation of ecological and evolutionary processes becomes more and more dicult. The emergence of such complexity in the intertwined nature of eco-evolutionary dynamics is a natural outcome of biological processes derived from mechanistic first principles [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This microscopic implementation of the model has the advantage of directly relating selective advantages to birth or death processes. This mechanistic way of thinking about evolutionary success has not been examined in the literature, see [21] for an essay about this. We believe that interpreting selection in a mechanistic way can give new insight into the concrete advantages of mutants and situations in which these mutants are beneficial.…”
Section: B Population Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerical model (Appendix A), the ecological dynamic of particles is expressed by a stochastic birth-death process (Champagnat et al, 2006;Doebeli et al, 2017). Each particle of type i ∈ {0, 1} is characterised by four traits (hereafter particle traits): colour (c i , red or blue), net maximum growth rate r i , and two competition parameters (a intra i and a inter i ).…”
Section: A Nested Model Of Collective Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that most major changes in animal population abundances are due to die-offs rather than population explosions (Anderson, Branch, Cooper, & Dulvy, 2017). Since evolution is a function of both birth rates and death rates (Doebeli, Ispolatov, & Simon, 2017), it would be similarly meaningful to measure the left tail of the distribution of descendants. This tail of the distribution is difficult to capture but may shed light on the relative importance of death in evolutionary processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%