2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a hybrid Eulerian–Lagrangian CFD modeling of coal gasification in a circulating fluidized bed reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle number in a parcel, Nnormalp, which affects the accuracy of results, is an important parameter for coarse‐grained modelling approaches . Usually in the DDPM modelling approach, the standard treatment for particle number in a parcel is calculated by the ratio of parcel mass to the particle mass: Nnormalp=mparcelmparticle=Nnormalpρnormalp16πdnormalp3ρnormalp16πdnormalp3=ρnormalp16πdparcel3ρnormalp16πdnormalp3=(dparceldp)3 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particle number in a parcel, Nnormalp, which affects the accuracy of results, is an important parameter for coarse‐grained modelling approaches . Usually in the DDPM modelling approach, the standard treatment for particle number in a parcel is calculated by the ratio of parcel mass to the particle mass: Nnormalp=mparcelmparticle=Nnormalpρnormalp16πdnormalp3ρnormalp16πdnormalp3=ρnormalp16πdparcel3ρnormalp16πdnormalp3=(dparceldp)3 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle number in a parcel, N p , which affects the accuracy of results, is an important parameter for coarse-grained modelling approaches. [28,34] Usually in the DDPM modelling approach, the standard treatment for particle number in a parcel is calculated by the ratio of parcel mass to the particle mass: [27,29,30,33,[52][53][54]…”
Section: Correlation For Particles Per Parcel Based On Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite, having benefits of Lagrangian methods and is applicable to large systems, it demands further tests and validations. Some predictions for coal gasification and coal oxy-fuel combustion in circulating fluidized beds (Adamczyk et al, 2014a;Klimanek et al, 2015), circulating fluidized bed boiler (Adamczyk et al, 2014b), impinging particle jet in a channel (Chen and Wang, 2014), solid sorbent carbon capture reactor (Ryan et al, 2013) and ceramic dispersion in liquid pool (Zhang and Nastac, 2014) are made using DDPM-KTGF model. (Ryan et al, 2013) have experienced less stability of DDPM-KTGF solution compared to Euler-granular model and MP-PIC method for a given reactor design and (Chen and Wang, 2014) highlights the requirement of further improvements for DDPM-KTGF model.…”
Section: Dense Discrete Phase Model Incorporated With Kinetic Theory mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restriction is solved at the expense of large computational time, and this subject still needs further development (Fan and Fox, 2008;Fox et al, 2008;. The hybrid Euler-Lagrange approach, usually known as the dense discrete particle model (DDPM) (Klimanek et al, 2015), alternatively as computational particle fluid dynamic method (CPFD) (Snider et al, 2011) or multiphase particle-in-cell method (MP-PIC) (Andrews and O'Rourke, 1996), can be treated as a compromise between the Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange methods. In the hybrid Euler-Lagrange framework, the particle-particle and particle-wall interactions are determined on the Eulerian grids and then interpolated to discrete particles for Lagrangian tracking (Alobaid, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%