1997
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a gold standard for quantitative coronary arteriography

Abstract: Densitometric quantification of coronary artery stenoses in angiographic images can be problematic for two reasons: (i) the x-rays are inadequately oriented with respect to the vessel segments of interest at image acquisition; (ii) non-linear effects due for instance to beam hardening, scattered radiation and veiling glare may reduce the accuracy. As a consequence, appreciable discrepancies between degrees of stenosis measured in two different projections can occur. To overcome these limitations, we have desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coronary angiography depicts the arterial lumen in a two-dimensional (2D) way and is the conventional method for assessing arterial morphology. In addition, it has been used for quantitative measurement of coronary lesions and disease progress [1][2][3][4][5]. Coronary angiography, however, provides unreliable quantitative data in some cases due to foreshortening and gives no information regarding the structure of the arterial wall (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary angiography depicts the arterial lumen in a two-dimensional (2D) way and is the conventional method for assessing arterial morphology. In addition, it has been used for quantitative measurement of coronary lesions and disease progress [1][2][3][4][5]. Coronary angiography, however, provides unreliable quantitative data in some cases due to foreshortening and gives no information regarding the structure of the arterial wall (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%