Towards a global security studies: what can looking at China tell us about the concept of security?

Abstract

Existing scholarship has demonstrated that theorising about security is Eurocentric. This leaves us with a partial account of the concept of security, which is presented as universal. This in turn generates explanatory problems because we are only seeing part of the picture. Yet there have been few attempts to move beyond critiques of Eurocentrism to examine the concept of security ‘elsewhere’. This paper takes China as its starting point, asking: what can looking at China tell us about security? In answering this question, the paper makes two contributions. First, it presents new empirical findings, building a conceptual history of security in China. Drawing on 140 key texts dating 1926–2022, the paper traces the emergence of the concept of security in China and its evolution through three explicit security concepts. Drawing on postcolonial insights it demonstrates that these concepts are hybrid, evolving out of multiple domestic and international influences. They have similarities as well as differences with the Eurocentric concept that dominates International Security Studies (ISS) and produce a discrete approach towards security that has been overlooked in a discipline that uses ‘Europe to explain Asia’. Second, considering these insights, the paper demonstrates that the universal concept of security that underpins theorising in ISS is partial and misleading. Differences in security concepts matter for theorising security and for understanding security policy. Consequently, I argue that we need to provincialize the concept of security: a truly global security studies is of necessity a provincial one attuned to difference and similarity.

The Role of Higher Education for Ensuring National Security in Ukraine

“…In addition, security means the stability and well-being of a nation in economic, political, social, environmental, and information dimensions (Branowicki, 2023). A broader concept deals with the protection of a nation's sovereignty and citizens' interests from external and internal threats (Nyman, 2023). In this view, national security involves a combination of military, political, economic, and social measures to respond to potential risks (Hirsch Ballin et al, 2020).…”

“…In this view, national security involves a combination of military, political, economic, and social measures to respond to potential risks (Hirsch Ballin et al, 2020). National security often involves the protection of a country's sovereignty and territorial integrity through military means (Nyman, 2023;Wyrębek, 2022).…”

China’s Arctic Strategy – a Comprehensive Approach in Times of Great Power Rivalry

“…But how does the ruling Communist Party understand the concepts of "security" and "interest"? Beginning with the concept of security, Jonna Nyman (2023) has recently argued that instead of more traditional Euro-American understandings of security as being mainly related to foreign (military) threats to the state, the Chinese concept of security is broader and more holistic in nature. It encompasses a wide range of political, societal, economic and military threats, seen as being complexly intertwined.…”

“…These subfields of security are closely interlinked, and threats and issues can travel from one subfield to another, or from the sphere of international security into the domestic sphere, in an unpredictable manner. While Xi Jinping's administration views security holistically in this manner, at the very centre of this concept is political security -that is, the security of the ruling regime itself (Nyman, 2023;Blanchette, 2022).…”