2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.102275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a generic optimal co-design of hardware architecture and control configuration for interacting subsystems

Abstract: In plants consisting of multiple interacting subsystems, the decision on how to optimally select and place actuators and sensors and the accompanying question on how to control the overall plant is a challenging task. Since there is no theoretical framework describing the impact of sensor and actuator placement on performance, an optimization method exploring the possible configurations is introduced in this paper to find a trade-off between implementation cost and achievable performance.Moreover, a novel mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual hardware and control optimization algorithm is performed on the closed-loop state-space system SS CL with an objective function related to the trajectory tracking and acceleration vibration reduction. Details on the different possible hardware types, related costs, non-linear constraints, and optimization results can be found in [12]. Fig.…”
Section: Optimization Results and Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The actual hardware and control optimization algorithm is performed on the closed-loop state-space system SS CL with an objective function related to the trajectory tracking and acceleration vibration reduction. Details on the different possible hardware types, related costs, non-linear constraints, and optimization results can be found in [12]. Fig.…”
Section: Optimization Results and Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and most important advantage of this proposed methodology is that it enables a thorough optimization of both the hardware architecture and the control configuration [12]. That is because when applying the presented methodology, the impact of adding or omitting specific controller structures can be investigated quickly by adjusting the corresponding controller gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-design examples mentioned so far succeed in the simultaneous optimization of separate hardware parts and controller tuning for fixed and rather modest feedback loops. In contrast, the author of this work recently proposed an optimization methodology to perform a thorough co-design of the hardware architecture and control configuration [13]. The proposed methodology can perform a hardware architecture and control configuration co-design in which more parts can be optimized at the same time, while considering more extensive and also changing controller architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the interactions between sub-loops in a process, a theoretical framework was proposed, which is useful for controller design problems [27]. An optimization method was proposed to make a trade-off between implementation cost and achievable performance for multiple interacting subsystems [28]. In order to optimize the choice of the cost function and their effect to the overall system performance, strategy for selection of the optimal criteria according to context conditions was proposed and a windmill park experiment was conducted to validate the performance [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%