Towards a framework for software measurement validation

Abstract

In this paper we propose a framework for validating software measurement. We start by defining a measurement structure model that identifies the elementary component of measures and the measurement process, and then consider five other models involved in measurement: unit definition models, instrumentation models, attribute relationship models, measurement protocols and entity population models. We consider a number of measures from the viewpoint of our measurement validation framework and identify a number of shortcomings; in particular we identify a number of problems with the construction of function points. We also compare our view of measurement validation with ideas presented by other researchers and identify a number of areas of disagreement. Finally, we suggest several rules that practitioners and researchers can use to avoid measurement problems, including the use of measurement vectors rather than artificially contrived scalars.

A Benchmarking Framework for Control Methods of Maritime Cranes Based on the Functional Mockup Interface

“…By using those different measures, it is possible to determine the extent of the property of interest [34]. When considering maritime cranes, indirect measures may provide performance estimations of the adopted control method.…”

Towards a Semiotic Quality Framework of Software Measures

“…involve empirical and formal validation of measures (Schneidewind, 1992;Kitchenham et al, 1995;IEEE Std. 1061Kaner & Bond, 2004).…”

Epistemological and Ontological Representation in Software Engineering

“…An example of the postulates of Kitchenham et al [17] is the necessity to apply the representational theory of measurement to software measurements. Fenton and Pfleeger [10] provide guidelines to define and apply metrics to measure the process or product characteristics.…”