Towards a framework for enhancing procurement and supply chain management practice in the NHS: lessons for managers and clinicians from a synthesis of the theoretical and empirical literature

Abstract

BackgroundThis review provides intelligence to NHS managers and clinicians involved in commissioning and procurement of non-pay goods and services. It does this in the light of ongoing pressure for the NHS to save money through a combination of cost cutting, productivity improvements and innovation in service delivery, and in the context of new commissioning structures developing as a result of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (Great Britain.Health and Social Care Act 2012. Chapter 7. London: The Stationery Office; 2012).ObjectivesWe explore the main strands of the literature about procurement and supply chain management (P&SCM); consider the extent to which existing evidence on the experiences of NHS managers and clinicians involved in commissioning and procurement matches these theories; assess how the empirical evidence about different P&SCM practices and techniques in different countries and sectors might contribute to better commissioning and procurement; and map and evaluate different approaches to improving P&SCM practice.Review methodWe use a realist review method, which emphasises the contingent nature of evidence and addresses questions about what works in which settings, for whom, in what circumstances and why. Adopting realist review principles, the research questions and emerging findings were sense-checked and refined with an advisory group of 16 people. An initial key term search was conducted in October 2013 across relevant electronic bibliographic databases. To ensure quality, the bulk of the search focused on peer-reviewed journals, though this criterion was relaxed where appropriate to capture NHS-related evidence. After a number of stages of sifting, quality checking and updating, 879 texts were identified for full review.ResultsFour literatures were identified: organisational buying behaviour; economics of contracting; networks and interorganisational relationships; and integrated supply chain management (SCM). Theories were clustered by their primary explanatory focus on a particular phase in the P&SCM process. Evidence on NHS commissioning and procurement practice was found in terms of each of these phases, although there were also knowledge gaps relating to decision-making roles, processes and criteria at work in commissioning organisations; the impact of power on collaborative interorganisational relationships over time; and the scope to apply integrated SCM thinking and techniques to supply chains delivering physical goods to the NHS. Evidence on P&SCM practices and techniques beyond the NHS was found to be highly fragmented and at times contradictory but, overall, demonstrated that matching management practice appropriately with context is crucial.ConclusionsWe found that the P&SCM process involves multiple contexts, phases and actors. There are also a wide variety of practices that can be used in each phase of the P&SCM process. Thinking about how practice might be improved in the NHS requires an approach that enables the simplification of the complex interplay of factors in the P&SCM process. Portfolio-based approaches, which provide a contingent approach to considering these factors, are recommended. Future work should focus on conflicting preferences in NHS commissioning and procurement and the role of power and politics in conflict resolution; the impact of power on the scope for collaboration in health-care networks; and the scope to apply integrated SCM practices in NHS procurement organisations.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Reverse exchange of healthcare devices: the case of hearing aid equipment in the UK

“…The resultant process has been identified as most effective due to the facilitating nature of the audiology department between the end user and manufacturer, with the centralised NHS Procurement team assisting with better enforcement and incentives for manufacturer cooperation. To achieve initiatives such as this, there is a need to apply integrated SCM practices in NHS Procurement (Sanderson et al, 2015) and for increased interdisciplinary work across health-care management and SCM (Hinrichs et al, 2014).…”

“…There is an ongoing pressure for the NHS to save money through a combination of cost cutting, productivity improvements and innovation in service delivery in the context of new commissioning structures developing as a result of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (Sanderson et al, 2015). Procurement has received an enhanced focus in recent years in the NHS where evaluation of service options, configuration, delivery, refinement, integration and the discussion of new pathways is in evidence (NHS Commissioning Board, 2012).…”

Exploration and assessment of the motivators of social sustainability in healthcare supply chains: Multistake holder's perspective

“…Realizing that few papers have addressed social sustainability through a theoretical lens (Carter & Easton, ; Hussain et al, ), we introduce stakeholder theory in healthcare supply chains, in which the human element is involved at every stage (Santilli & Vogenberg, ). Additionally, the available literature focuses on the organization's interactions with certain stakeholder groups in a separate manner (Ajmal et al, ; Esmaeilzadeh, Sambasivan, Nezakati, & Kumar, ; Huibin and Yuan, ; Piening, Baluch, & Salge, ; Sanderson, Lonsdale, & Mannion, ; Santilli & Vogenberg, ). No previous research has comprehensively explored the interconnected relationships in the service supply chain.…”

The Informing Needs of Procurement Officers in Israel

“…The distinction between formal and informal (i.e., incidental) sources has been suggested by Sanderson et al (2015). In Table 3, we describe the mean and standard deviation of these channels of information and report these variables' internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha).…”