2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55415-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Framework for Benchmarking Privacy-ABC Technologies

Abstract: Technologies based on attribute-based credentials (Privacy-ABC) enable identity management systems that require minimal disclosure of personal information and provide unlinkability of user's transactions. However, underlying characteristics of and differences between Privacy-ABC technologies are currently not well understood. In this paper, we present our efforts in defining a framework for benchmarking Privacy-ABC technologies, and identifying an extensive set of benchmarking criteria and factors impacting su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we have adopted the Privacy-ABC technologies evaluation framework proposed by Veseli et al [20]. This framework defines a rich set of criteria for benchmarking Privacy-ABC technologies based on their efficiency, functionality, and security assurance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we have adopted the Privacy-ABC technologies evaluation framework proposed by Veseli et al [20]. This framework defines a rich set of criteria for benchmarking Privacy-ABC technologies based on their efficiency, functionality, and security assurance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated two mature and robust ABC implementations, namely, ABC4Trust and Coconut using the benchmarking framework developed by Veseli et al. (2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated two mature and robust ABC implementations, namely, ABC4Trust and Coconut using the benchmarking framework developed by Veseli et al (2014). We constrained the factors from the benchmark to what is relevant to our study which is the functionality and practical viability of permissioned Blockchains.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Privacy-abc Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this aspect as well as the provision of privacy properties (recall Section 3.4), Section 6.3 discusses the feasibility of each ABC technique in the considered use cases. For this assessment, we have adopted the framework for evaluation of Privacy-ABC technologies proposed in [56]. We enhance this framework by considering additional criteria particularly useful for understanding the potential of ABCs in VANETs.…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of simplicity, we did not use all of the criteria described in [56], but only those elements that were common for the three technologies and which we considered to be suitable for the scenarios we have chosen. Particularly, we evaluated the time taken for system setup, issuance, as well as time to do a presentation, which is split into two parts, namely proving, which happens at the User side (in our case, on the vehicle), and verification, which is done by the verifier (in our case, by the Central ITS Station).…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%