2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Dynamic Data Driven Wildfire Behavior Prediction System at European Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, they do not track the local evolution characteristics of different parts of the continuous object and thus cannot provide decision support using predictive modeling. Dynamic Data Driven Application Systems (DDDAS) [16]- [19] try to address some of these severe limitations. Their main objective is to continuously improve the quality of predictions produced by hazard-specific models (mathematical, semi-empirical, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they do not track the local evolution characteristics of different parts of the continuous object and thus cannot provide decision support using predictive modeling. Dynamic Data Driven Application Systems (DDDAS) [16]- [19] try to address some of these severe limitations. Their main objective is to continuously improve the quality of predictions produced by hazard-specific models (mathematical, semi-empirical, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior DDDAS approaches have demonstrated improvements in simulation accuracy under controlled conditions, especially when infield sensors offer high-quality measurements of a wildfire's front-line [21]- [24]. However, the limited efforts to validate wildfire DDDAS approaches using real-time, noisy measurements from real wildfires have not proved as successful [25]. This is why in [26] we have introduced a flexible data assimilation approach, where we first calibrate the mechanism producing the wildfire simulation model's output before attempting to adjust its input parameters when significant simulation drift is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This avoids specific treatment of the front markers [52]. This also avoids the use of morphing that involves a complex registration mapping [7] and provides valuable spatial information compared to usual similarity scores [6,23]. To this end, our goal is to rely on a front shape similarity measure introduced in the context of data assimilation for cardiac electrophysiology [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%