2009
DOI: 10.1177/0042098009346328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Digital (Societal) Infrastructure?

Abstract: In what ways might informational techniques and information technology alter the infrastructure of society? The approach employed in this paper involves a number of fundamental, almost historically determined, conditions for the emergence of an increasingly societal infrastructure. This discussion is then related to analyses of the significance of information and communication technologies (ICT) in terms of ubiquities, agglomerations and clusters. Are there grounds for assuming that these trends are having an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital platforms are simultaneously deterritorialising (or 'unfixing') labour practices and re-entrenching spatially uneven patterns of the precarious positioning of workers in value chains that reflect global coreperipheries (Graham et al, 2014). In their review of existing literature on digital geographies, Ash et al (2018) reveal that the focus of much geographical enquiry has been on inequalities in access to digital technologies, with a smaller number of analyses of the reconfiguration of labour in the gig economy (Graham et al, 2017a;2017b), the rise of digital labour ( € Ohman, 2010) and the uneven global geographies of micro-work (Lehdonvirta, 2016).…”
Section: The Recontextualisation Of Remote Working and Its Hrmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital platforms are simultaneously deterritorialising (or 'unfixing') labour practices and re-entrenching spatially uneven patterns of the precarious positioning of workers in value chains that reflect global coreperipheries (Graham et al, 2014). In their review of existing literature on digital geographies, Ash et al (2018) reveal that the focus of much geographical enquiry has been on inequalities in access to digital technologies, with a smaller number of analyses of the reconfiguration of labour in the gig economy (Graham et al, 2017a;2017b), the rise of digital labour ( € Ohman, 2010) and the uneven global geographies of micro-work (Lehdonvirta, 2016).…”
Section: The Recontextualisation Of Remote Working and Its Hrmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[92,93]. The adoption of digital tools and platforms enhances transparency, efficiency, and decision-making, creating In parallel, the material and societal facets of infrastructure, as emphasized by Öhman (2010) [109] and Ablyazov (2021) [110], play a crucial role in shaping spatial development and socioeconomic factors. The integration of digital technologies into physical and virtual infrastructure, for example, by the use of IoTs and smart technologies, enhances efficiency, resilience, and adaptability [115,117].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öhman (2010) [109] and Ablyazov (2021) [110] underscore the societal and material facets of infrastructure, highlighting its role in shaping spatial localizations and influ-encing various socioeconomic factors, which was also supported by several other scholars [111][112][113][114]. Digital technology has broken the physical barrier and become a pervasive presence across space and time.…”
Section: Influence Of Digitalization On the Development Of Physical A...mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation