2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a decision support tool with an individual-based model of a pig fattening unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Ecoalim dataset ( Wilfart et al, 2016 ) of the AGRIBALYSE database, the environmental impacts of the diet ingredients were estimated by applying the ReCiPe Method ( Huijbregts et al, 2017 ). A distance of 100 km was assumed for the transport of the ingredients of the diets from the farm to the feed factory, a distance of 500 km for cereals ( Garcia-Launay et al, 2018 ), and a distance of 30 km ( Cadero et al, 2018 ) for transport from the feed factory to the pig farm, using the Ecoinvent version 3.1 database (attributional life cycle inventories).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Ecoalim dataset ( Wilfart et al, 2016 ) of the AGRIBALYSE database, the environmental impacts of the diet ingredients were estimated by applying the ReCiPe Method ( Huijbregts et al, 2017 ). A distance of 100 km was assumed for the transport of the ingredients of the diets from the farm to the feed factory, a distance of 500 km for cereals ( Garcia-Launay et al, 2018 ), and a distance of 30 km ( Cadero et al, 2018 ) for transport from the feed factory to the pig farm, using the Ecoinvent version 3.1 database (attributional life cycle inventories).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of the pig fattening unit considers individual variability in performance among pigs, farmers feeding practices and animal management, and estimates environmental impacts (through Life Cycle Assessment) and economic results of the unit (Cadero et al, 2018a). This model provides reliable estimates of the fattening unit performance (Cadero et al, 2018b). A virtual experiment was designed with 96 scenarios, resulting from different options for batch interval (7 vs. 35 days), management of lightest pigs (use or no use of a buffer room), feed rationing (ad libitum, restriction to 2.5 kg/d) and sequence plans (two-phase, daily-phase), scale of application of the feeding programs (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart Livestock Farming (SLF) is one of applications of PA that supports real-time monitoring of productions, health, and welfare of livestock, and to ensure optimal yield, to increase the management capacity of animals. A variety of sensors and actuators and decision-making tools, and IoT technologies are used in SLF (Cadero et al 2018). Electronic identification systems such as ear tags, ruminal boluses, and sub-cutaneous radio-frequency identification; on-animal sensors like accelerometers, global positioning systems, and social activity loggers; and stationary management systems, milking parlor, and related technologies and flock management software are used in SLF (Vaintrub et al 2021).…”
Section: Examples From Digital Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%