2010
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqq020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a decision support system for reading ancient documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strategy fits well with models of visual search [104] and information seeking [102]. In-depth user studies and theoretical models of papyrological reading strategies implemented in expert systems are discussed in [56,155,176,177].…”
Section: Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The strategy fits well with models of visual search [104] and information seeking [102]. In-depth user studies and theoretical models of papyrological reading strategies implemented in expert systems are discussed in [56,155,176,177].…”
Section: Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their solution on a database containing the considerable epigraphical corpus of wall graffiti and dipinti of Pompeii. Another example is DUGA, a Web information system that facilitates the interpretative process of damaged ancient documents [Roued-Cunliffe 2010]. The main motivations for the development of DUGA are the complexity of the reading process and the difficulty to record and recall how the final interpretation of the document was reached, as well as which competing hypotheses were presented, adopted, or discarded in the process of reading.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI has been trained in different projects to aid researchers to process and interpret texts in Latin and Greek. Examples include APELLO (Roued-Cunliffe, 2010) and EAGLE (Amato et al ., 2016) aimed at identifying letter-cutters in Athenian inscriptions (Panagopoulos et al ., 2009; Tracy et al ., 2007), an attempt to decrypt Mycenaean Linear B and the Ugaritic script (Luo et al ., 2019), or even to partially or totally restore words and sentences through pattern recognition (Assael et al ., 2020; Ross, 2023). In addition, archaeological research has implemented several algorithms that have enabled programs to learn to identify settlement patterns, buildings and artifacts discovered through telematic prospections and drone flights (Argyrou and Agapiou, 2022; Berganzo-Besga et al ., 2021; Caspari and Crespo, 2019; Davis et al ., 2021; Orengo and Garcia-Molsosa, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%