“…The existing literature indicates that the viability of LADM for 3D digital cadastre was investigated in various jurisdictions around the world (Janečka et al, 2018). These jurisdictions include Brazil (Purificação et al, 2019), China (Ying et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2017;Zhuo et al, 2015), Czech Souček, 2017, 2016), Croatia (Mader et al, 2018;Mađer et al, 2015;Vučić et al, 2017Vučić et al, , 2013, Greece (Gkeli et al, 2018;Kalogianni, 2015;Kitsakis et al, 2018), Israel (Felus et al, 2014;van Oosterom, 2014), Korea (Kim et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2015), Serbia (Radulovic et al, 2018;Radulović et al, 2017aRadulović et al, , 2017b, Malaysia (Jamil et al, 2017;Rajabifard et al, 2018a;Zulkifli et al, 2015Zulkifli et al, , 2014bZulkifli et al, , 2014a, the Netherlands (Stoter et al, 2013), Poland (Góźdź and van Oosterom, 2016), Russia (Vandysheva et al, 2011b, 2011a), Trinidad and Tobago (Griffith-Charles et al, 2016, and Turkey (Alkan and Polat, 2018;Aydinoglu and Bovkir, 2017;Polat and Alkan, 2018). Although LADM provides a comprehensive set of entities for modelling legal concepts, physical elements can be linked to LADM entities externally.…”