2019
DOI: 10.22329/csw.v6i1.5712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Critical Theory of Disability in Social Work

Abstract: The dominant discourse on disability in social work has been that of an individual/medical model, which largely relegates the ‘problem’ of disability to a deficit within the individual. This paper calls for re-visioning disability: notions of disability in social work are contrasted with alternative frameworks, such as social and cultural constructions, materialist and political economy perspectives, and critiques of disciplinary power and the discourses of normalcy and measurement. These alternative conceptua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors further argue that such processes result in stigma and discrimination and, therefore, provide incentives to look for alternatives to biomedical accounts of mental illness. Furthermore, scholars within this camp (e.g., Harper & Speed, 2012;Hiranandani, 2005;Poole et al, 2012;Poole & Ward, 2013) argue that mental illness should be understood using the social model of disability; namely, that mental illness is a label which results in an experience of disability due to a socially constructed world which favours certain abilities over others.…”
Section: Mad Scholars and Critical Disability Theoristsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors further argue that such processes result in stigma and discrimination and, therefore, provide incentives to look for alternatives to biomedical accounts of mental illness. Furthermore, scholars within this camp (e.g., Harper & Speed, 2012;Hiranandani, 2005;Poole et al, 2012;Poole & Ward, 2013) argue that mental illness should be understood using the social model of disability; namely, that mental illness is a label which results in an experience of disability due to a socially constructed world which favours certain abilities over others.…”
Section: Mad Scholars and Critical Disability Theoristsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reluctance in which participants discussed their diagnoses, the ways in which participants sought to control their diagnoses, and, above all, the ways in which participants sought to fit in and behave like others, suggest that governmentality as new eugenics (Baker, 2002) may be a notion relevant to understanding mental illness. While social models of disability argue that impairment is not a necessary result of disability (Hiranandani, 2005), it is unclear what might result if disability is destroyed through self-government.…”
Section: Resilience As Governmentalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical theory can be distinguished from traditional theories because it seeks human emancipation and transforms the circumstances that enslave human beings (Bohman, 2012:1). [30] Unlike other critical theories, the critical disability theory refutes the medical model and strives for equality and inclusion (Hosking, 2008:17 [29]; Pothier & Devlin, 2006:2, 9-10 [31]). As far as the critical disability theory is concerned, the vital question is not whether a particular person is disabled or not, but rather what society's response to the person's circumstances will be (Pothier & Devlin, 2006:5).…”
Section: C) Critical Disability Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, the disability discourse has been a minority agenda on post-secondary campuses; it has been firmly anchored in Critical Theory and has involved only a minority of actors and sadly reached few people (Hiranandani, 2005). UDL offers disability activists in higher education the opportunity to offer access solutions which have relevance to a wide student body because they remove barriers for all students (Howard, 2004).…”
Section: Outcomes For the Future Of Access In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%