2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a continuous crystal APD-based PET detector design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case using two APD arrays coupled to both ends of the crystal, a 20-mm thick monolithic crystal detector offers good spatial resolution similar to 10-mm thick crystals with single front read out [59]. This approach also employs PS-APDs or SiPMs as alternative sensors to APD arrays [60,61].…”
Section: Continuous Doi Measurement By Single-ended Readoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case using two APD arrays coupled to both ends of the crystal, a 20-mm thick monolithic crystal detector offers good spatial resolution similar to 10-mm thick crystals with single front read out [59]. This approach also employs PS-APDs or SiPMs as alternative sensors to APD arrays [60,61].…”
Section: Continuous Doi Measurement By Single-ended Readoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pixelated crystals are traditionally employed, the use of continuous crystals demonstrated increased sensitivity [1][2][3][4][5][6]. However, high intrinsic spatial resolution requires an accurate estimation of the g-ray position interaction within the crystal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a variety of methods for g-ray position interaction estimation: those based on analytical models [2], neural networks [3], statistical methods [4] or previous calibrations [6] among them. Some methods provide only the two coordinates at the surface of the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the use of monolithic detectors allows to obtain higher active volumes and higher efficiencies with spatial resolutions as good as those from pixelated detectors. Coincidence imaging is achieved by determining the point-of-entrance of the 511 keV photons over the surface of these monolithic detectors using neural networks (NN) algorithms which estimate the x and y surface coordinates based on a previous training process with known incidence positions [6]. Our proposed PET insert has external and internal diameters of 60 cm and 40 cm resp.…”
Section: Main Features Of the Brainpet Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%