2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Computational Framework for Modeling the Impact of Aortic Coarctations Upon Left Ventricular Load

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of blood flow in the left ventricle (LV) and aorta are important tools for analyzing the mechanistic links between myocardial deformation and flow patterns. Typically, the use of image-based kinematic CFD models prevails in applications such as predicting the acute response to interventions which alter LV afterload conditions. However, such models are limited in their ability to analyze any impacts upon LV load or key biomarkers known to be implicated in driving remode… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(147 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational cost imposed by higher resolution EM models requires efficient numerical solvers. Strong scaling characteristics of our numerical framework were reported in detail previously [ 41 , 82 ]. The compute times reported in Section 3.4 indicate that setup and assembly time were the dominating factors during the initial passive inflation (loading) phase while for the subsequent coupled 3D–0D EM simulations of a heart beat solver time was the predominant part of total CPU time.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The computational cost imposed by higher resolution EM models requires efficient numerical solvers. Strong scaling characteristics of our numerical framework were reported in detail previously [ 41 , 82 ]. The compute times reported in Section 3.4 indicate that setup and assembly time were the dominating factors during the initial passive inflation (loading) phase while for the subsequent coupled 3D–0D EM simulations of a heart beat solver time was the predominant part of total CPU time.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The first approach tracks the deformation of the heart from timeresolved imaging and imposes this motion to the fluidic domains inside the heart, which leads to a deforming-domain CFD problem [8][9][10][11][12][13]. The second approach couples electrophysiology, structural mechanics, and fluid dynamics in the heart so that the heart motion is solved for rather than measured [14][15][16]. This second approach is formidable and is generally unnecessary if the purpose of the model is to derive intracardiac hemodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in computational modeling techniques now enable AS to be studied from a cardiovascular systems perspective. LV-aortic coupling is a concept that describes the inter-dependency of the LV and the aorta/systemic blood vessels that impact cardiovascular function ( Karabelas et al, 2018 ; Shavik et al, 2018 ; Ikonomidis et al, 2019 ). Multi-domain models of the human heart and circulatory system now offer a complete mechanistic model of the ventricles, aortic valve, and vasculature, making it ideally suited to investigate AS ( Baillargeon et al, 2014 ; Genet et al, 2014 , 2016 ; Dabiri et al, 2018 ; Sack et al, 2018b ; Ghosh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%