Supplier selection is one of the most important components of supply chain management. The main objective of this exercise is to select best suppliers based on different criteria. Those criteria are often closely related with sustainability and are set by the decision-maker. Hence, the objective of this paper is to integrate sustainability and decision-making. The sustainability aspect of the model includes economic, environmental and social dimensions and strategic level of decision-making criteria. The methodology used in this paper is mathematical modeling and the problem is formulated as mixed integer linear programming. The integration of sustainability and supplier selection is presented on an illustrative example of a bio-fuel supply chain. The best multi-objective solution is obtained using the weighting sum method. The study indicates that the integration of several sustainability aspects and supplier selection can be useful for decision making process. The main contribution of this work is the integration of supplier selection with the sustainability of supply chains. Contribution/Originality: The main contribution of this paper is in the field of sustainable supply chain development. The methodology used was mathematical modeling (optimization). The objective was to integrate supplier selection and sustainability of supply chains. 1. INTRODUCTION Supply chains (SCs) are considered one of the main part in today"s economy and business organizations (Pasandideh et al., 2015) and their goal is to deliver products from front end (supply) to back end (demand) (Tang and Musa, 2011). Additionally, SCs are characterized by forward (open loop SCs) and reverse movement (closed loop SCs) of material (Easwaran and Üster, 2010; Govindan et al., 2015; Pedram et al., 2017). SCs are integrated networks of raw materials suppliers, manufacturers, warehouses, distribution centers, and consumers (Melo et al., 2009) with various aspects of inter-network (within SCs) competition and relations seen from business managements perspective (Lambert and Cooper, 2000; Mentzer et al., 2001). The common interest of all SCs players is most often reflected in terms of economic gains (Carter and Liane Easton, 2011). The most common measure of a SC performance is its sustainability (Schaltegger and Burritt, 2014) which is approached at three levels, namely: economic, environmental and social (Beske and Seuring, 2014; Joyce and Paquin, 2016; Rajeev et al., 2017). Although, SCs and sustainability have been defined in many ways over the years, the most often used definition of sustainability describes it as: "development thata meets the needs of the present without