2022
DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2022.3209910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Complete Safety Framework for Longitudinal Driving

Abstract: Formal models for the safety validation of autonomous vehicles have become increasingly important. To this end, we present a safety framework for longitudinal automated driving. This framework allows calculating minimum safe intervehicular distances for arbitrary ego vehicle control policies. We use this framework to enhance the Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) model and models based on it, which fail to cover situations where the ego vehicle has a higher decelerating capacity than its preceding vehicle. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These principles offer more granular details about the underlying movement processes of the involved vehicles [39]. In these safety principles, regulations regarding the inter-vehicle distance [40] or gaps have been introduced. In recent years, the formulation of safety rules for autonomous vehicles has been formalized as a verification problem, following standard practices in the realm of software engineering [41].…”
Section: Notations Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These principles offer more granular details about the underlying movement processes of the involved vehicles [39]. In these safety principles, regulations regarding the inter-vehicle distance [40] or gaps have been introduced. In recent years, the formulation of safety rules for autonomous vehicles has been formalized as a verification problem, following standard practices in the realm of software engineering [41].…”
Section: Notations Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic Preventive Braking (APB) has been developed for collision avoidance in car-following [9], [10]. In the APB system, constraints on the jerk profile define a safe longitudinal distance, making the braking mild and comfortable [19], [20]. However, real data-based testing shows that APB might have fluctuations in the braking process frequently, which will corrupt the braking distance and increase the risk of collisions [8].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-vehicle scenario of longitudinal driving [15] in a string formation, referred to as platooning [16,17], has been thoroughly investigated from a control-theoretic perspective in terms of concepts such as string stability [18], model predictive control (MPC) [11], and spacing policy [19,20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to human-driven vehicles, it is natural for a CAV to experience temporary braking and stopping for various reasons including, but not limited to, emergency braking [15,[21][22][23], passing through signalized and nonsignalized intersections [24], stop-and-go waves [25] and pedestrian crossings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%