2014
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v22.1913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Comparative and International History of School Testing and Accountability

Abstract: Abstract:The speed and extent of modern school accountability have obscured the history of testing and accountability. This brief introduction identifies central themes of historical research into educational accountability and recurring traits associated with accountability practices. We hope our colleagues and this special issue will also help to identify future research paths in this field. Some of the central themes found in the historical research on educational accountability contained in this special is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study contributes to ongoing discussions in this journal and elsewhere about how ideologies shape discourse through which education policies, systems, and practices affect students' opportunities and futures in complex, multi-layered ways (e.g., Bertrand, Perez, & Rogers, 2015;Dorn & Ydesen, 2014;Oakes, Wells, Jones, & Datnow, 1997;Spillane, 2012). It also offers theoretical and practical implications beyond the Singaporean context, in part, due to the neo-liberal and meritocratic ideologies driving education and political systems worldwide (Apple, 2006;Hursh, 2007;Koh, 2011) in which market-based discourses frame education in terms of maximizing resources toward greatest economic growth and competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This study contributes to ongoing discussions in this journal and elsewhere about how ideologies shape discourse through which education policies, systems, and practices affect students' opportunities and futures in complex, multi-layered ways (e.g., Bertrand, Perez, & Rogers, 2015;Dorn & Ydesen, 2014;Oakes, Wells, Jones, & Datnow, 1997;Spillane, 2012). It also offers theoretical and practical implications beyond the Singaporean context, in part, due to the neo-liberal and meritocratic ideologies driving education and political systems worldwide (Apple, 2006;Hursh, 2007;Koh, 2011) in which market-based discourses frame education in terms of maximizing resources toward greatest economic growth and competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Research has highlighted debates around decentralization in relation to a wide range of school reforms in the global context. While motives for decentralization reforms differ according to national and local contexts of education, research findings around the world show that (1) political and administrative motivations are critical and (2) the level of decentralization ranges from national/state, to local/regional, to individual school-level authority (e.g., Bray, 2013;DeBoer, 2012;Dorn & Ydesen, 2015;Edwards & DeMatthews, 2014;Manna & McGuinn, 2013).…”
Section: School Decentralization Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responding to accountability discourses, researchers have reported theoretical debates around different forms of accountability, such as what forms of accountability ought to be considered over test-based accountability which has been dominant in education (e.g., Cranston, 2013;Fullan, Rincón-Gallardo, & Hargreaves, 2015;Sahlberg, 2007;Turnipseed & Darling-Hammond, 2015). In addition, researchers have empirically shown that there are multiple ways to achieve accountability across education systems internationally (e.g., Dorn & Ydesen, 2015;Klein, 2017;La Londe, 2017;Lim, 2016;Maroy, Pons, & Dupuy, 2017;Rasmussen & Zou, 2014;Thiel & Bellmann, 2017). Findings from these studies indicate that accountability policy implementation remains multifaceted depending on the context (Holloway et al, 2017;Klein, 2017), and therefore, the logics behind the implementation of accountability can differ based on historical backgrounds and structures of the education system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorn and Ydesen (2015), explored the common features and educational accountability prevalent in previous studies in the United States of America in order to identify future research directions in accountability. The study of Dorn and Ydesen (2015) revealed a positive relationship between educational accountability style and the purposes of education in some historical periods, the harmony of its organizational structure with the structure of the government, and accountability cannot operate in isolation from the community accountability that is the source of its authority, and access to educational institutions and management [12]. Additionally, accountability practices must meet the aspirations of education stakeholders; students and parents.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%