Towards a common and semantic representation of e-portfolios

Abstract

Purpose Since the early 1980s, a paradigm shift, caused by the work undertaken in the field of cognitive psychology, has occurred. This shift is known as the move from teacher-centered instruction to learner-centered or learning-centered instruction, and emphasizes the importance of building new knowledge on previous ones, interacting with peers, making meaningful and reflective learning and being engaged in his own path to foster learning. This new vision of teaching has created a need for new learning and assessment instruments that are better adapted to these pedagogical realities. In this context, the electronic portfolio or e-portfolio is one of the most versatile and effective tools that have been proposed for this purpose. More specifically, the interest in e-portfolios has grown considerably with the emergence of the competency-based approach and portfolio-based competency assessments. The purpose of this paper is to describe a semantic-based representation of e-portfolios, defined on the basis of official e-portfolio standards and specifications. Moreover, a comparative study of several well-known e-portfolio solutions has been carried out based on different facets, such as functional features, technical and organizational features. The objective is to identify those features that are mostly supported by e-portfolio solution providers and accordingly to gain a fairly accurate idea of the common structure of e-portfolios. In addition, the authors take advantage of an already implemented ontological model describing competency-related characteristics of learners and learning objects and combine it with the e-portfolio ontology, with a view to support a more reliable and authentic competency assessment. Design/methodology/approach The proposed e-portfolio ontology was built following the ontology development methodology Methontology (Fernandez et al., 1997). In addition, it was constructed using the Protégé ontology environment (Protégé, 2007) and was implemented in OWL (Web Ontology Language) (Antoniou and Harmelen, 2004). Findings The proposed e-portfolio ontology provides humans with a shared vocabulary that enables capturing the most important elements in e-portfolios and serves as the basis for the semantic interoperability for machines. Originality/value The main advantage of the e-portfolio ontology lies in its ability to provide a common and semantically enriched representation of e-portfolio artifacts, thus facilitating the interoperability and exchange of competency evidences between different learning systems and platforms. In addition, capturing the semantics of e-portfolios helps to make them utilizable by intelligent applications.

AI-Powered Decentralized Recruitment System on the Blockchain

“…Increased trust and credibility in recruiting outcomes result from recruiters and candidates expressing faith in the validity and integrity of candidate data recorded on the Blockchain. Furthermore, ADRSoB's transparency promotes responsibility and adherence to data protection laws (Rezgui et al, 2018). The examination of ADRSoB yielded significant findings that underscored its efficacy in augmenting recruitment procedures concerning efficiency, candidate selection quality, bias mitigation, transparency, and user satisfaction.…”

An enhanced online learning environment in the time of COVID-19

“…Semantic web standards are employed in this paper to introduce common data formats for a learning processbased blockchain that allows data to be shared and reused [6].…”

Supporting self-regulated learning and personalization using ePortfolios: a semantic approach based on learning paths

“…There are specifications such as IMS ePortfolio and JISC Leap2A that can be used for developing new e-portfolio systems solving interoperability problems. Nevertheless, they are based on the XML language, in which the semantic of the elements is comprehensible by humans but not by machines (Rezgui, Mhiri, & Ghédira, 2018).…”

“…Nguyen and Ikeda (2014) propose an ontological model that is used to design and implement an ePortfolio system in order to promote self-regulated learning. Rezgui et al (2018) develop an ontology to represent different types of e-portfolios and their resources, based on standards and official specifications like IMS ePortfolio and JISC Leap2A. Although these models present a great advance in the use of semantic tools, they do not use the concept of learning paths, a feature that further enriches personalization.…”