2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a collaborative (public-private partnership) approach to research and development in Canada’s forest sector: an innovation system perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models determine the decisions of inventory planners [16,17]. In addition, an important contribution was made by works aimed at studying the public-private partnership mechanism in the forest complex, including concession relations [18][19][20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models determine the decisions of inventory planners [16,17]. In addition, an important contribution was made by works aimed at studying the public-private partnership mechanism in the forest complex, including concession relations [18][19][20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rules, trends, policies, and administrative laws that control, direct or manage the activities, organizations, and systems are all addressed in this category (Cloutier, et al, 2020). Robitaille et al (2017), Dockry et al (2018) and Hayter & Clapp (2020) are authors who mentioned several mechanisms from this category.…”
Section:  Governance Practices (Gp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forestry research, innovation systems are usually addressed as institutional learning and interaction processes, region or value-chain (see, e.g. Weiss et al 2017 , Hayter and Clapp 2020 , Lovrić and Lovrić 2020 ). The MLP framework does not set such boundaries and magnifies the role of non-institutional agents (such as forest owners and their social embedding), and especially end-users (those who benefit from multifunctional forests) (Geels 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%